As Mom always said: Go play in the street (UPDATED)
First no dogs on Fountain Square, now this? Cincinnati City Manager Milton “NoFun” Dohoney is proposing an ordinance to ban all game-playing in city streets. It’s already illegal to use roller skates, skateboards or the like in the street except at a crosswalk. But police, according to Dohoney’s memo to City Council, increasingly find that residents are using streets to play basketball, baseball and football – kinda like most of us used to do when we were kids. What’s next? A rule requiring pedestrians to walk single file on the sidewalks and to avoid stepping on cracks?
UPDATE: On Wednesday, Dohoney issued a statement saying he was withdrawing the proposal because it "did not get the proper vetting in the Administration before I advanced it (and) I want to find a reasonable solution and exhaust other options before proposing an ordinance that affects citizens citywide." Translation from Bureaucratese: "We caught so much flak on this that we've got to take it back to the drawing board -- or bury it in the circular file." And why is Dohoney's office submitting ordinances that are not "properly vetted" first anyway?
Seriously, of course, there are legitimate safety issues here. The charm of playing stickball or H-O-R-S-E in the street has to give way to the hazardous realities of modern life. Nobody wants to see players struck by cars or traffic snarled by stubborn street athletes.
The ordinance also would allow officials to close roadways during low-traffic times to use as “play streets.” If city officials are really serious about that part of the proposal, they have an opportunity to turn a “thou shalt not” into a community-building positive.
A British organization called Living Streets, which “promotes walking through the creation of streets and public spaces that are accessible, safe and supportive,” proposes that the availability of play streets be expanded at residents’ request, making streets available on Sunday afternoons for youngsters to meet and play. Further, it advocates designing and adapting streets to allow year-round play in some areas.
The idea, notes Living Streets, is to promote “social cohesion” – something Cincinnati could certainly use as well. As Robert Frost might or might not put it, good streets make good neighbors.
Still, you wonder just how widespread the “problem” of unauthorized street sports really is in Cincinnati, and whether city officials have bigger things to worry about right now. Come to think of it … maybe while they’re at it, City Council members will consider an ordinance to require that the Bengals play in the streets – along with non-incumbent council candidates, of course.
4 Comments:
Ray, when I was a young girl my mother forbade me to play football in the streets with boys. Of course, I didn't listen to her. Your suggestion sounds like great fun.
We have city leaders who have recommended cuts in recreation and now want to forbid children to play in the street by city ordinance. I can see the wisdom of not sending children out to play in the middle of Reading Road, but Carnation Avenue????
I agree that City Council has bigger fish to fry than to populate the Juvenile Detention Center with children who play in the street.
While the sentimentality makes this a hard debate, I don't think you are aware of the reality. Groups of kids are playing in the street, stopping traffic, refusing to move, bouncing basketballs and footballs off of cars. Your suggestion may sound like fun, but it's not fun for those of us who have paid out money to fix our broken and dented cars. Not to mention how unsafe it is. People don't drive as slow as they did back in the good ol' days.
This will be fine for kids who live in Hyde Park or Mount Lookout and have a half-acre yard.
What about kids in OTR or the West End who have no yards?
I fear that they're not being taken into consideration.
To anonymous re: "People don't drive as slow as they did back in the good ol' days."--
Is that the kids' fault?
Re: Melanie Bates--
She's right--making playing in the street illegal will only amount to locked up kids. That's not REALLY the point, is it?
Re: Bottom line on this story, as I see it--
People don't want kids playing in the street (because of safety concerns and traffic problems). Others don't want kids to lose out on
I should think the solution is obvious, but I guess we sometimes get so caught up in the either/or mentality pushed on us by politics.
Doesn't it make sense to invest in safe, outdoor, non-street places for kids to play? Shouldn't that be a no-brainer??
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home