*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Melanie Bates: Public Safety is Cincinnati's #1 Issue

There should be no hesitation in agreeing that public safety is the infrastructure for a high quality of life in the city of Cincinnati, and really, all communities.

If people are afraid to walk our streets, they won't purchase homes in the city.

If people are not comfortable coming into our neighborhoods or downtown for entertainment and to conduct business, economic development efforts will be unsuccessful.

There are city ordinances and programs that, if enforced and implemented, will lead to an eventual elimination of crime. Please take note that I used the word elimination rather than reduction. Crime reduction often enables an outmigration of criminal activity to other neighborhoods and to first ring suburbs in Hamilton County. Although recently published crime statistics indicate a reduction in violent crime in Cincinnati, we are now seeing a rash of homicides in suburbs such as Silverton and Colerain Township. Public safety efforts must focus on eliminating crime, not just shifting it.

For instance, we have an ordinance in effect that requires landlords to evict criminals who have generated repeat calls for service. This ordinance has received scant enforcement. Look at it this way -- if you have a home alarm system and you have excessive false alarms, the city requires you to attend "alarm school" and/or pay fines. If there are repeat calls for service -- calls alerting law enforcement to criminal activity -- shouldn't there be a penalty for that behavior as well?

Hot spots of crime exist in every city neighborhood. Law enforcement and residents know these hot spots -- the areas that host criminal activity and generate repeat calls for service. Resources must be strategically focused across the city to eliminate activity at these hot spots.

A very small percentage of people are engaging in violent criminal activity. Everyone else needs to stand together and make these violent criminals know their criminal behaviors are not welcome in our city.


7 Comments:

at 11:10 AM, October 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Way to go Melanie...Your comments on addressing public safety issues for the city are right on target and couldn't have been stated better.
You truly understand and genuinely care about the needs of the residents of this city. You personally relate well to how other victims of violent crimes have felt and how their lives have been affected forever. You have taken the "I" out of politics and have put the vision of "We" back into play to show you are a strong leader with high morals and integrity!!

 
at 12:48 PM, October 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're right - safety of citizens should be the number one priority of government.

Your goal of ELIMINATING crime is admirable and should be pursued.
That's just a first step.

Until the scourage of drug and alcohol addiction is eliminated, fewer children grow up in single family homes and parents actively motivate their children to achieve academically poverty and crime will persist.

The community will support you in your effort.

 
at 2:03 PM, October 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Melanie is correct.

The city of Cincinnati has tools (ordinances) for modifying property owner behavior, with regard to crime and disorder, and if those tools are not being used to their fullest extent, then the neighborhoods themselves should push the City Manager to do so.

At best the police are displacing violent crime to other neighborhoods and outside of the city. Criminals are following the path of least resistance.

The recent violent crime reductions this year are more likely than not directly related to the extraordinary efforts (and costs) of Cincinnati Police "Vortex" and Sheriff's patrols.

What happens to our public safety in the city, if budgetary constraints cut into Sheriff's patrols and police overtime?

 
at 2:18 PM, October 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems to me that Ms. Bates does not have a particularly good understanding of how crime fighting works since she goes out of her way to emphasize her belief that crime can be eliminated.

If we used the death penalty for every crime from murder to trespassing, crime would still not be eliminated. Granted there would be a huge reduction, but the only thing to be eliminated would be repeat offenders.

Real crime fighting measures should be used to reduce crime to its lowest possible point which we are of course nowhere near right now. Ms. Bates goes on to provide as an example of her crime elimination plan actual use of the city ordinance requiring landlords to evict criminals. More proof that she is out of touch with reality. Besides the obvious problem that most landlords are not in fact police officers and have no police powers as landlords in any case, she seems to think that repeated calls for service should require a penalty. Newsflash, the police are there to handle calls for service and should there be criminal activity, it is the criminals themselves that should be punished not landlords or other reporting witnesses.

In point of fact as a city council member, Ms. Bates can do very little about crime fighting except for seeing that the city's police department is fully staffed and properly equiped as well as ending unreasonable restraints on police like the so-called collaborative agreement. Will she do any of this?

The things that will put a real dent in crime require more jail and prison space and the political will to use it. No pleas deals, no early releases, no probation, just swift and sure punishment. These things fall outside of the purview of city council.

I for one will be happy to support Ms. Bates or anyone else if they can bother to provide real solutions to real problems that do not involve violating my Constitutional rights or those of my fellow citizens.

I would respectfully suggest to Ms. Bates and the other candidates if they really want to do some good in this area, that they take some time to study the Constitution's Bill of Rights and with that in mind spend some time with Cincinnati police officers doing ride-alongs and seeing how things are actually done and being done, and get input from those officers who are fighting crime on the front lines as to what can and should be done to improve public safety.

 
at 3:09 PM, October 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The city crime has over ran Mt. Airy and is now into Green Township. The only option is to move further North, West to Indiana, or South to N. Ky.

 
at 3:44 PM, October 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The crime is moving to all other areas of the tri-state. We have reduced the number of sheriff's patrols on the west side of Hamilton County so we can send the Deputies to OTR / VORTEX. Why should the honest tax paying citizens, on the West Side of the County, have to wait 30 minutes for a Sheriff's car to arrive for a call? To me it is all political BS! Get tough with the criminals, let the Police Officers DO THEIR JOBS WITHOUT A STUPID "AGREEMENT" that ties their their hands, and hold the politicians accountable for their actions or in-actions as the case may be.

 
at 3:22 PM, October 08, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Melanie Bates seems like she gets it... I don't think there is a single candiate for any office that understands as well as melanie bates does the harm that violent crime can bring to the residents of cincinnati. We have tried white politicians and black politicians, male politicians and female politicians... and none of them have done anyhting to reduce violent crime in Cincinnati!

Here we have a widowed mother of 3... I couldnt possibly imagine someone who would work harder to fight crime.

Melanie Bates has my support!

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck