*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Friday, October 27, 2006

Shame, silence and the female body

Abortion, the morning-after pill, breast augmentation and now the controversy over the vaccine for the human papilloma virus (HPV). Once again, the female body becomes a political battlefield.

The debate over the HPV vaccine is especially troubling. Doctors say it will protect females from the sexually transmitted disease and possibly save them from cervical cancer, especially if given early. But some families worry they're sending the wrong moral message by having their young daughters vaccinated, or simply dread discussing such a personal issue with them at all. Some parents hope the vaccine can be administered with other immunizations at birth, thus sparing them "the talk."

The discomfort, shame and certainly the silence send girls damaging messages about their bodies and their sexuality. Denying them information about their health -- which is, after all, what this discussion is really about -- is not only dangerous but downright negligent.

Researchers say an HPV vaccine is in the offing for boys and men. It will be interesting to see if the same sort of uneasy, protective silence enshrouds the issues for them as well.


4 Comments:

at 3:36 PM, October 27, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, you go Girl! The decision to have one's child vaccinated for genital warts is of the utmost importance and should never be left to the parents, let alone the individual. I tell you, only a federally mandated " Manhattan Project" to inoculate every elementary school girl will succeed in combating this hidious plague!

I am glad to hear that researchers are also working on vaccines " for boys and men", but could'nt they make one that works on both?

 
at 3:55 PM, October 27, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have never understood parents who keep reproductive information from their daughters. It is the responsible thing to do as a parent. I have always had open communication with my daughters about sex and reproduction plus discussing what their life goals are. It is in no way promoting teen sex, it is promoting being responsible.

 
at 9:42 PM, October 27, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm more concerned about this vaccination because they know nothing about it and its affects over the next 10 years. As a mother of a 10 yr. old girl, I'm more skeptical about giving her a drug that has just been introduced versus talking to her about sex.

 
at 6:06 PM, October 28, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is there a parent out there, fearing the 'talk,' who would rather their child suffer and be ignorant as opposed to informed and free of worry of this or any other disease? If they exist I sincerely wish, for their children's sake, they had not procreated.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck