*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

No joy ride

The pre-dawn death of eighth-grader Quavale Finnell Monday behind the wheel of a stolen car has cautionary tale written all over it. The 14-year-old was shot by the car owner Bennie Hall, 61, in front of his Kennedy Heights home. Finnell's home was miles away, in South Fairmount, with his mother. The boy already had a juvenile record of 13 offenses, including breaking and entering.

A few very preliminary observations.
1. Why was an eighth grader with 13 juvenile offenses permitted to stay away from home the night before a school day?
2. It's hindsight, but he would have been safer in detention. What help if any did the courts attempt after his previous offenses?
3. Even though 14 year olds nowadays commit heinous crimes, it's still an awfully young age to understand that grand larceny or even breaking or entering is a high-risk crime.
4. If this was, as it appears, a car-theft, the boy was most at fault in initiating it. But the usually sharp lines between offender and victim quickly blurred. The car owner's action may have made him a double "victim," even if not charged. He has to live with the knowledge he killed a kid. Both boy and car owner exhibited a false sense of property rights.
5. Gun owners need to be very clear that ignorance of the law is no defense, and that includes the legal limits on use of deadly force.


2 Comments:

at 6:39 PM, October 24, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your following statement is naive at best and condescending on many levels:

“Even though 14 year olds nowadays commit heinous crimes, it's still an awfully young age to understand that grand larceny or even breaking or entering is a high-risk crime.”

Are you suggesting that the 14 year old is too stupid to know better that his actions were criminal? I have not heard anyone mention that he was mentally handicap.

Quit making or searching for excuses for criminals. You are naive to think that a 13 time criminal offender believes that crime is a low risk venture. Do you think his 13 other known offenses were without incident of getting caught or the thought of apprehension?

What has a 14-year old with 13 plus crimes under his belt not fearful of the law are individuals like yourself ready to find social environmental factors as excuses to forgive, forget, and be lenient on punishment.

Your attitude of low expectations results in lower performances of behavior. You are a sponsor of criminal behavior and don't even know it.

 
at 10:15 AM, October 25, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought Tony Lang's comments were reasoned and thoughtful. The fact is there are a lot of dumb-acting people out there, especially in the teenage ranks. If you don't believe me, watch Judge Judy for a couple of weeks.

Both Finnell and Hill were wrong, and both contributed to the outcome. My guess is that both acted on impulse without thinking through what they were about to do. I can understand why Hill may have wanted to carry a weapon considering the area in which he lives. We don't know what experiences Hill previously had with crime. If he had been a victim before, that might explain his desire to arm himself and his unwarranted reaction to his car being stolen. We also do not yet know if he even intended to hit Finnell or to simple disable the car.

One of problems with firing a gun at a moving target in the type of situation in which Hill found himself is that it is very difficult to hit what you are aiming at. Even highly skilled and trained shooters can have trouble. Hill was wrong to shoot not only because his response was not proprtional to the threat he encountered, but also because he placed innocent people at risk if he missed his target.

Right now we simply ned to keep all of those involved in our prayers. They will surely need them.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck