*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Tales from the bus

Halfway through my first week ever of riding Metro to work, here are a few observations:

*You never know who'll show up on a bus. This morning I climbed on to find a Channel 12 news team on board. I tried hiding behind my newspaper. Really, we news types aren't trying to hijack your ride, Route 3X regulars. You're just way ahead of the rest of us on saving on fuel and being environmentally responsible. So thanks.

*It seems that the most common topic of conversation on the bus is. . . the bus. Riders like to talk about the routes, their strategies for dealing with missed buses and bad weather, how much money they're saving, the friends they've met literally along the way.

*Riders and drivers are very tolerant of first-timers. Once when I was in Chicago, I tried to put a dollar in a slot for bus passes. The young, incredibly rude driver slammed his hand down on it and screamed at me. Yikes -- hop on board. Metro drivers have greeted me, thanked me, briefly explained my afternoon pick-up spot and gently reminded me that, on my return route, I pay before I get off, not upon boarding. And my fellow passengers -- hey, I like these people so much I wish I worked with them! One may give my son Chinese lessons; another has turned into an email pal.

*OK so my express route from the northern part of Hamilton County isn't a typical ride. Still, it blasts the myth that bus-riding carries some kind of social stigma. I ride with brief cases, backpacks, really expensive haircuts and tattoos. The one thing my fellow passengers have in common is that they're smart enough to take public transportation, and they don't seem to care what anybody else thinks about it.

*I can save more than $1,200 this year by taking the bus, as well as 7,000 miles on my car. I have become my own economic stimulus package. . .


11 Comments:

at 7:35 AM, April 24, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's great to hear your observations as a first time Metro user. Now with the streetcars passing (and hopefully light rail), this city will start having viable public transportation. I hope you are able to articulate your thoughts on public transportation in print for the paper..

 
at 1:25 PM, April 24, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Krista, my wife came from a family with no money to own a car. They took a bus to the first sibling's wedding... I tease her about it to this day, 35 years later. But they were a quality family--and the bus was their connection to the world.
I am one who thinks bus passengers are great people!

 
at 1:28 PM, April 24, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wish that Cincinnati voters had been proactive and had not voted down light rail. Wouldn't it be nice, with gas sure to hit $4 a gallon in the next year, to be able to take the train to work? What an added bonus it would be to take all those cars (and buses) off the roads, and reduce the emissions they cause.

Yep, sure would be nice.

 
at 4:37 PM, April 24, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I tried commuting to work by bus for the better part of a year. It was a much shorter route (Pleasant Ridge to downtown) and the riders were a mix of students, laborers and office workers (no expensive haircuts) but still very nice people. However, it took almost an hour each way (including a 20 minute walk to the nearest bus stop which is 1/2 mile away). So I tried the express, which saved me about 40 minutes each day but only if I drove to the express pick-up stop. The problem there was the last return was at 5:25 so if I had to work late, I'd have to take the regular bus and walk 1/2 mile to the express stop on a busy street without sidewalks.

We have got to do something to fix the bus system if it's going to be viable and we need to do this before we sink money into the streetcars. And yes, I voted for the light rail levy, not because I'm a proponent of light rail but because it included money to address the public transportation needs of the region.

 
at 11:59 AM, April 25, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just a reminder that most of the people in the older Cincinnati neighborhoods who've been taking the bus without interruption, lo these many years, are probably in a different economic class from the people who will now try to experiment with riding. The reason I bother to say so, is that there've been a few commments about "strange" people or a "quality family" and while I'm sure no offense was intended, I think it's revealing that cars have truly separated our society in very harmful ways. In cities with a fully functioning transportation system and disincentives for using cars, EVERYONE uses the system and is used to seeing eveyrone one else.

This is the first time I've ever owned a car and I hate it. It's like flushing money down the toilet; and I have my eyes on the road all the time, twitching like a jackrabbit when I could be reading a book or taking a nap. REnting a car for a long weekend away is a great privilege and pleasure; owning one is lifealtering in all the wrong ways.

 
at 3:04 PM, April 25, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I cannot imagine that you can name a city in which EVERYONE uses public transport. In every city, some use cars, some use other modes.

 
at 11:24 AM, April 26, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

To 3:04 PM - Sorry, I used the wrong word. I meant "people of all types", not just the economic underclass who don't own cars. Specifically, I was thinking of NYC with a population of about 12 million and the transportation system (subways, buses) moves about 7 million a day - this would include those who make roundtrips and those who don't commute using anything including a car, but walk or work from home. Also this doesn't take into account the ability to hail a roaming cab which, apparently, our city doesn't allow unless you find a taxi stand or call one.

Anyway, that's what I meant. There are people with incomes allowing car ownership in such an expensive city, but they don't use them to commute with any regularity when public transit is so available; they're more like luxury items to travel to weekend homes, or haul something.

 
at 5:07 PM, April 27, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't think the goal is for everyone to use one type of transportation. If everyone used public transportation it would be just as congested as our highways are today. I think the goal of transportation is for individuals to have different transportation options. You should have the convenient option of either driving, taking a bus, riding a streetcar or light rail, riding a bike, or walking. I think you want to see all of those forms of transportation in the city...

 
at 7:19 AM, April 29, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"If everyone used public transportation it would be just as congested as our highways are today."

But if we had light rail, you would actually be removing vehicles from the roads. Too many people refuse to see the value and benefits of light rail, and instead listen to the fear-mongers who blather about crime rates and low ridership.

The problem with Cincinnati is that our public transportation options are limited to buses and taxis, which only add to congestion and pollution. Trains don't sit in traffic, and they don't produce harmful emissions. Had people not voted them down years ago, we'd already be on our way to developing a working system. Instead, we're behind AGAIN as gas prices are rising and traffic gets worse.

Now with the streetcars people are again losing sight of the goal - to spur development rather than respond to it.

Why, oh why, can't people around here think outside their tiny little boxes and see the bigger picture?

 
at 7:09 AM, April 30, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Two sort-of related comments.

1) In New York, Central Park and the subways were thought of as crime ridden in the 70s and early 80s. Decisions were made to encourage people to use these two public services and by sheer numbers of re-occupation, they both became habitable again. We lack leadership with vision, here.

2) Why are building a light rail that has no further plan or funding than to take it to UC? "We have to just get started!!" What kind of plan is that? I smell trouble - thing gets finished with no future expansion plans, just in time for the economy to go into recession. Then we have one more means of transportation in areas where we already have a concentration of buses which can be used. We need light rail to outlying ex-urbs which we have encouraged to develop such as Warren and Butler counties.
Is this light rail thing supposed to be an "ornament" for downtown again? Sounds like poorly thought out nonsense dressed in all the right eco-friendly language. GET REAL with it.

 
at 1:07 PM, April 30, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

By biggest problem with the Metro as it stands now is how seemingly indecipherable the route system is. Granted, I am a novice bus-rider, and the only reason I ride is because it's free (UC ID = Free ride!). However, I like to think I'd use public transportation more often if I could figure out how the heck to get from one place to another if I don't already happen to live on the route that connects "Point A" to "Point B." And believe me, I've tried! I haven't had similar problems in NYC or DC--both have transit systems that are "user friendly," and I'm more than happy to use them when I visit.

Do I think everyone should use the bus? I guess that's up to them. For me, it's a money-saver (but wouldn't be if it wasn't free), but not necessarily a time-saver. I enjoy the people-watching, and have even unexpectedly found friends and colleagues on the same bus. However, I will never give up my car. I realize that it is a privilege to own a car, and an expensive one at that, but that's my decision to make. I love my car, and the convenience, choice and flexibility it offers me. The bus, unfortunately, is not so flexible. We don't live in NYC or DC where the Subway or Metro comes every 5 minutes if just miss one. If I miss the 7:15 bus, it's 7:50 before the next one comes.

Although our humble bus system has a lot of flaws (including stops every freakin' block on some routes!), I am glad I've been able to explore it as a transportation option as gas prices rise.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck