Greg Harris on City Hall and Cincinnati Public Schools
Q. In the past when I have raised concerns about the public school system to council members, I have always been told that is an issue for the board of education. It seems once candidates are elected to City Council, the priority of our public schools is passed off to the board of education. If you are elected, what is your specific plan to have City Council to be more directly involved in the public school system issues? And will you regularly attend the board of education meetings? (Garry Smith, Madisonville)
We may have reached an era when a part-time school board served by members who receive only token pay does not cut it anymore. A recent performance audit of Cincinnati Public Schools by McKinsey & Co revealed a good deal of dysfunction between the central office and the board, including a lack of long-term planning, inefficient budgeting and human resources, lacking role clarity, etc. (Disclaimer: my employer, KnowledgeWorks Foundation, played a role in facilitating this independent performance audit.) Of course, the current school board's "discovery" of a $79 million deficit represents an oversight of such magnitude that it is nearly impossible to comprehend.
We may have to revisit the issue of State or mayoral takeover of Cincinnati Public Schools. Now please know, this does NOT mean CPS would be run by City Council. What it means is that a State appointed local board that is paid real salaries for their time is charged with CPS' overhaul via clear benchmarks and clear chain of command. (Earlier in my campaign I proposed that such a board be formed of corporate and community leaders to conduct a performance audit of City Hall to streamline operations, improve performance, and shine light on a culture of entrenchment that aways seems to outlast reform-seekers.) Now that such an audit has been performed on CPS (the McKinsey report), we might consider empowering an emergency independent board to remake CPS' central office--especially if the levy fails this Nov. (which would put the district in crisis mode).
Of course, there are ways City Hall can work with CPS. Our city-supported community centers house after-school programs (my son is bussed to one such program when school lets out). We can beef up truancy patrols. We can ensure that new school buildings or rehabbed building are consistent with neighborhood land use plans, and engage the communities that house them. It's a cop out to pass the buck when it comes to our public schools. City Council can and must be critical partners in ensuring their success.
Our teachers teach the hardest to teach in a city that is third in the nation in poverty. We must bolster their ability to do their jobs with community centers equipped to provide quality after school offerings, truancy patrols to ensure students aren't cutting class, and school facilities that are designed with neighborhood input and that serve as centers of community.
8 Comments:
I'm afraid Mr. Harris just lost my vote with the proposal for a state-appointed board. The idea that a state-appointed board would be better able to manage the administration is ludicrous. The Board is one thing; the administration is another.
An elected board is more responsive to the citizens of Cincinnati. While the curricula at Montessori and Paideia schools has been negatively affected by the imposition of state and local pacing guides and benchmarks, its nothing next to what would happen with a state-appointed board. Anything different would be swept off the table whether it's working or not. All kids would be doing the same thing on the same day, regardless of the name on the school.
To keep some level of autonomy, CPS must avoid a state-appointed Board and pass the levy.
I think you missed Harris' point. He is saying a LOCAL board should be appointed by the State with a mandate to fix operations (central office, etc.). He indicates our current part-time board doesn't have the capacity or knowhow to do this. Based on their track record, I would have to agree.
I guess you think a board that didn't even know it had a $79 mill deficit can be trusted to overaul CPS operations? Very naive.
How ironic that CPS' Finance Chair Melanie Bates is about to get elected to City Council!
It's a common misconception that there's a 79 million deficit. There isn't. The budget is balanced. Deep cuts were made in 2004. The budget was held flat since then. Cuts have been made each year to keep to that budget.
IF THE LEVY DOES NOT PASS, BY 2012 there will be a $79 million deficit with the current level of expenses. The budget has been cut to the bone and a bit beyond. There's no more fat there that would help avoid the deficit.
But currently, there is no deficit.
And a local board appointed by the state. That's still a state-appointed board, isn't it? And who would be appointed to that board? Someone like Tom Brinkman who wants to see the system dismantled? Neil Bortz who says the system is broken beyond repair? I'd rather have elected officials who believe in the district and want to make it better not take it apart.
State takeover in the event of a levy failure would mean that Gov. Strickland would be empowered by the legislature to appoint an ad hoc board to restructure CPS (finances, reporting, transparency, etc.). Harris proposes this restructuring should adhere to the McKinsey report recommendations for fixing the central office and grounding district-board relations in long-term goals and practices.
I would imagine such a commission would include business leaders, school administrators, CPA's, and outside consultants. I'm sorry, but when I look at the current slate of school board candidates, I see few examples of folks with the expertise to do the job that's required.
CPS "discovered" only a couple months ago that it faced a projected $79 million deficit, which led them to rush an emergency levy to the ballot. You are an apologist for the CPS Board's ineptitude. Teachers, students, and parents suffer under the status quo.
I applaud Harris for having the intestinal fortitude to posit potential solutions despite the political fallout.
The impartial board would still then have to go out and lobby an uninvolved public to pass levies. They'll still have to appeal to voters. So their "above the fray" position would either be in name only if they decide to campaign for levies OR they would not campaign and the district would lose necessary public faces explaining why CPS needs to pass a levy - school kids lose either way.
Harris is running for city council because he thinks he can make a difference. There's been squabbling and inaction, but by replacing a few people the council can get moving again. He thinks that because he's familiar with this world.
Same thing with the board. Replacing a few people will make all the difference in being able to move forward. Harriet Russell is gone. Florence Newell will be gone. Rosa Blackwell will be gone *(hallelujah!). Those three women were the biggest obstacle to real change in the district.
Yes, aside from Rick Williams, the board candidates are uninspiring. Eve Bolton would be okay. The other two, it's the greater of two lessers.
But what I want from a councilman is someone who can work WITH the district not call for it to be dismantled.
You folks keep missing Harris' point. He did not say get rid of the school board. He said we need explore appointing a commission to oversee implementation of the recommendations of the Mackenzie report because the current board does not have the capacity to do so. I think a special commission would be helpful. It's a cop out to say pass the levy and we'll be fine. Let's go beyond that and fix the problems that led to our current financial crisis.
What we do not need is some apparatchik board imposed from above by the state government in Columbus. What that kind of board does, first and foremost, is impose a standardized curriculum across the district. Just ask Cleveland.
In Cincinnati that would be devastating. For the Montessori, Paideia, and foreign language schools, it would eliminate what makes them successful schools. Those families that are living in Cincinnati because of those schools would be driven out.
We do not need to destroy what's working in order to fix what's not.
And who is saying pass the levy and we'll be fine? Every single candidate for school board is saying "things have to change." With Newell and Blackwell out of the way, chances for real change improve significantly.
Look, you can change a district by changing the superintendent. We're doing that. You can change a district by changing the board. With three openings and one incumbent we're doing that.
Williams, Bates, Cranley, and Cooper-Reed want to start working on those areas the McKinsey report pointed out as problem areas.
But no real change can happen if the economic rug is pulled out from under the district. You won't change a district for the better by starving it of the money it needs for everyday expenses such as teachers, materials, transportation, etc.
So pass the levy, elect a new board to select a new superintendent, and then we'll all focus on expanding what is working and changing what is not.
I'm glad my post has prompted debate on the need for school reform, although regret that my suggestion have been so misunderstood by some.
Under No Child Left Behind, if failing schools don't fire teachers and principals and restructure they are to be turned over to the State or different management entity or else risk losing federal dollars. I think CPS can avert this fate with some proactive governance reform that will elevate the performance of CPS’s central office and board.
CPS has some high performing schools and many low performers. We clearly outperform all other urban districts, and have many dedicated teachers and students. But there are also glaring signs of mismanagement of finances, etc.--as evidenced by the recent discovery of a massive projected revenue shortfall. There are just no excuses for this.
We can continue to hope for election year pledges for reform, and we can continue to fight for stop gap levies, and we can continue to hope the status quo governance structure transforms itself. I happen to support the levy, but feel much more needs to be done. I also fear that the levy’s passage will lessen the scrutiny over CPS.
I believe that we should be proactive as a community and empower diverse third party expertise to help reorganize the district, not let the McKinsey & Co report recommendations sit on some shelf, and arm our next superintendent with the tools and capacity to impel much needed change. When it comes to CPS, now is the time for an all hands on deck approach to bold reform. And I just don’t think our current governance structure is equipped to deliver on this front without third-party help.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home