*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Sunday, October 21, 2007

PAVELISH on COUNCIL AND SCHOOL BOARD

It just maddens me when I see these new Cincinnati Public schools under construction and knowing that this new construction will cause three dozen old, traditional, historic, beautiful, former schools to be added to the list of vacant Cincinnati buildings. I'm not against the construction of new schools, I just like the old building and its tradition. And Cincinnati will demolish, no doubt, several of these "castles", just like it did to the beautiful school in Pleasant Ridge. But the School Board tells us that "improved" education will come forth with these new buildings and "we need these facilities to compete with the suburban schools. " And the voters continue to fall for that "story."

I am a fan of Cincinnati Public Schools. My four adult children are products of the public school system and their experience was excellent. Public School teachers are dedicated and hard working and some of the finest people that I know. Many have become my friends. But the stories that I hear from these teachers about the waste, the ineficiencies, and the disconnect between the teachers and the administration and the Board troubles me.


Many of our voters want to know if City Council should get involved in the public school meetings and planning. And would this cooperation help? Or would Council members at the School Board meetings begin to micro manage "what they don't know?"


Personally, I feel that our present School Board members are not the best minds on education - they are the best POLITICIANS on education. But I feel the same way about City Council - the best politicians. (and those of us running for Council)


And what is it about City Council that would make you want these "leaders" to direct your child's education.? Don't the public schools have enough problems?? There was a joint committee at City Hall formed not too long ago to address some of the ills of the schools but, in my opinion, nothing was really accomplished.


The best solution to cure some of the ills of public education is to elect a GOOD school board. Getting to know the candidates WELL is important before you vote. (and a solution to the ills of City Council, the same)... Public school parents must get involved as room mothers, field trip monitors, teacher helpers, and most of all, help with homework. Every school has a teacher - parent advisory board and great direction can come from here. And let us all demand the return of neighborhood schools.


But, yes, City Council members should attend school board meetings and offer input. But City Council is a part time and many of our Council members just have NO time. Our children are our best natural resource and our only future and they must be provided the best education possible . But even greater minds need to get involved, and that is YOU...



I, as a FULL TIME City Councilmember believe that good education for our children should be our first goal and I WOULD have the time and desire to attend school board meetings and assist where needed...


Steve Pavelish for City Council



http://www.pavelish.com/


9 Comments:

at 5:36 AM, October 22, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, Steve, there once (still?) was a joint committee between the school board and city hall. But it was led by David Crowley, so it went nowhere. Crowley is a good guy, but a very ineffective Councilman (save for using Council time to debate the war in Iraq).

 
at 10:05 PM, October 22, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I like the Pavelish approach to schools and the idea of the neighborhood school

 
at 10:53 PM, October 22, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ever been in one of those "castles"? Ever tried teaching in one?

Forget the incredibly inefficient and inadequate heating systems. Forget the leaky windows that frequently don't open. Forget the dripping roofs. Forget the pitiful two or three electric outlets in a classroom. Forget the quarter-size gymnasiums and 1930s size lunchrooms. Forget the lack of air conditioning or any kind of cooling beyond oscillating fans teachers brought in themselves (at risk of blowing the whole school's electrical system).

Sure they are beautiful buildings. But what's going on inside is far more important than the exterior. And these new buildings help students learn by removing the obstacles the old, antiquated buildings presented and allows teachers to work in ways that the old schools never could. More comfortable learning environments, better use of technology (without blowing out the whole school), separate spaces for small group instruction away from the distraction of the larger class. All those things will help students continue the progress we've been making.

And that's the most important element of school: students make progress.

 
at 2:33 PM, October 23, 2007 Blogger pavelish said...

Sir,
I was educated in old schools (17 years) Many people feel that education of PAST years was superior to todays' education and that was "housed" in old schools. I grew up in an old house and never felt air conditioning until age 22 or 23 (I am 57 years old).
And I taught school for three years in the 1970's.
You mention some poor school conditions and I agree. My four children were educated in Cincinnati Public and I saw the conditions. Cincinnati Public drops the ball when it comes to MAINTENANCE. Four years ago I was told that half of the maintenance budget went towards student vandalism. Will vandalism stop at a new building?? And the poor maintenance team will be brought to the new schools.
I would agree that the old schools need work ,expanded gyms, better heating/cooling systems. etc. but NEVER, NEVER blame poor education on a building.

Steve Pavelish
www.pavelish.com

 
at 5:00 PM, October 23, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that the school budgets are distibuted in the wrong ways. Instead of building all these new schools, how about taking some of that money and fix up the current builldings the schools alredy inhabit. I realize they need lots of maitnence, but that is much cheaper than putting up brand new buildings. Use some of that money they would be saving and give that to the teachers and programs(art,music,gym)the schools currently have.

 
at 10:28 PM, October 23, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Two things.
(1) Extensive surveys were done on the costs of rehabbing vs. new construction for each and every school. In many cases it is significantly cheaper to build new.

(2) By state law, money for construction can not be spent on programs or operating expenses such as music, art, or teachers.

 
at 2:04 PM, October 24, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems like they always have the laws and the money for whatever the school board wants to do. If it's so much cheaper to build a new school then how come one paticular school I can think of is not being torn down, but being turned into condos!! Huh doesn't sound like that school would cost too much to rehab it.

 
at 6:03 PM, October 24, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you serious? Where have you been?

The district is downsizing and doesn't need all the buildings that it owns now. So they're able to sell some of the buildings. Isn't it great that they're selling to housing developers? That certainly helps the city, don't you think, to have more residents living here? Reduces urban sprawl, increases the city population and the tax base, all at the same time. Good move, eh?

I would add, though, that it may be more cost-effective for a developer to rehab a property because it will turn around and sell it for a profit. The district will turn around and ... run it. So there are different considerations. For example, if it's incredibly ineffient to heat and cool that building the district will get stuck with those costs. The developer won't be around to pay the Duke Energy bills on that property for the new owners.

 
at 9:01 PM, October 25, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Pavelish, Thanks for coming to the Kennedy Heights Candidate Forum the other evening. I have to say that seeing you changed my impression of you and your stances, particularly on the schools. I apologize if I was rude in any of my postings. I can see that you are a well-meaning person. I appreciate your support of the schools and respect your positions based on your experiences.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck