*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Friday, August 03, 2007

Goodbye to John Gilligan

John Gilligan’s decision to retire from the Cincinnati School Board closes out one of the most varied political careers in Cincinnati history. He’s pretty much done it all.

Starting in 1953 he has served on Cincinnati City Council, then Congress, then back to Council, then to the governor’s mansion and finally, starting eight years ago, on the school board. Between times he managed two fit in service in the Navy, a university academic career teaching at Xavier and Notre Dame and a stint running the Agency for International Development in Jimmy Carter’s administration.

As with any Ohio governor, he was occasionally mentioned for a spot on a presidential ticket. For political trivia buffs, he also is the elder half of a father/daughter gubernatorial combination. His daughter, Kathleen Sebelius, is governor of Kansas.

He’s 86 now, and as he told reporter Ben Fischer, it’s time to go.

The first press conference I ever covered featured Gilligan in 1974, when he was running for a second term as governor against Republican James Rhodes. He and Rhodes were served up on a twin bill at a seminar for college journalists in Columbus.

Gilligian was a studious wonk. He ticked off detailed answers defending every action his administration ever took and offered to have staff members research the answers to anything he didn’t have at his fingertips.

Rhodes came in and said he could balance the budget, feed the hungry, clothe the poor and fill the state with good-paying jobs.

When asked for details, Rhodes lectured us that such questions were naïve because campaigns were won on strategies and no politician would let the opposition in on details of his strategy. I remember thinking nobody could buy this blowhard’s baloney and that Gilligan should coast to re-election. Gilligan then lost by about 11,000 votes.

Four years ago I was interviewing Gilligan as he ran for his final term on the school board. I told him I couldn’t believe people actually voted for Rhodes. He said he still couldn’t believe it either.


9 Comments:

at 10:59 AM, August 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most observers of Ohio government give Rhodes great marks for his 1963 to 1971 run in office, and mediocre marks for his comeback years, 1975 to 1983.

Other than being a nice guy, what did John Gilligan accomplish as Governor? I remember Rhodes being way past his "mental faculties" prime when he debated Gilligan for Governor. Non the less, this was a nice opportunity for Lib Wells to trash a dead Republican like Rhodes.

 
at 11:01 AM, August 06, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Accomplishment: Ohio income tax.

 
at 3:48 PM, August 06, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good Point Anon 11:01. Raising income taxes is always a fitting and well deserved tribute for a Democrat.

 
at 8:40 AM, August 08, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ohio income tax...doesn't that help pay for things like police, fire, roads, bridges, and other non-essential, liberal, Democratic crap that you depend on every single day?

How the heck do you expect the government to provide public services with no money?

 
at 12:40 PM, August 08, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Umm - statehood for Ohio in 1803, Ohio income tax in 1972, a span of 169 years without a state income tax. The question is not how do we pay for the public services but which "public services" should a government provide? Are citizens willing to pay for what is being provided? If not, why is the strong arm of government being used to force citizens to pay for services that they would not purchase of their own free will? The answer is because it can. It is really redistribution of wealth? And what rational basis is there to decide who should get how much from whom?

 
at 1:11 PM, August 08, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You authorize me to spend $10,000 on your government services. I'll actually spend $15,000. Then, provide you $5,000 in value, if you’re lucky.

Yep, government program spending is an excellent vehicle to provide both essential and nonessential services. And we'll even permit the government to tell us what our essential needs are. It's a beautiful system for the politicians to play with our collective personal incomes.

 
at 1:34 AM, August 09, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You can't believe anyone voted for Rhodes that one time? I can't believe anyone voted for Gilligan at any time in the last 35 years. He 3 decades too late in retiring.

Good riddance to Gilligan and tell him to take his daughter with him.

 
at 1:04 PM, August 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 12:40 Aug. 8, good post and good point. Obviously, life is much different from 1803, when we were still an agricultural society and the industrial age was not yet upon us. The economic structure was vastly different, and the big government expenditure back then was for the railroad.

In today's world, we have absolute need for some public services. These services are mandated for the general good of all people, regardless of income level or complexion, gender, etc. These include fire, police, education, public transportation, infrastructure (roads and bridges, seaports and airports, water and sewer services), jails, hospitals and caring for the poor and needy.

Many of the above services are already privatized and are failing in their duty. Many of these are government run and are also failing. This leads me to believe that the problem isn't in the private or public domain as much as the lack of responsible financing, accounting, purchasing and budgeting. All that boils down to one word...greed.

When both public and private sector managers stop being greedy and concerned only for their own pockets, and instead work collaboratively for the common good, then we will see the problem addressed and probably corrected. Until then, we have no hope of fixing the situation.

It comes down to human behavior, which is sociologically the hardest thing to change, but once changed, leads to astounding progression and improvement.

So, the real question becomes this: how do we make greed unappealing and repulsive in our society?

(There's a Christian societal model, too, but it's really radical in today's society...it was radical back then, too. Book of Acts, 2:42-47 and 4:32-35 if anyone's interested.)

 
at 6:58 PM, August 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 1:04 pm ....I assume your post is meant to be serious?

"instead work collaboratively for the common good, then we will see the problem addressed and probably corrected"

You just described socialism and communism. That collective work for the common good worked out real well for Russia and East Europe. But I'm sure you know better?

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck