Outstanding in their fields - six feet under
Maybe you can’t take it with you, but evidently you can keep taking it to the bank. The U.S. Department of Agriculture paid out $1.1 billion in farm subsidies to 172,801 dead people between 1999 and 2005, the Government Accountability Office reported this week. That’s a lot of pennies to heaven. Or wherever.
Apparently, the USDA has been outsourcing its payments operation to the Chicago Board of Elections. Who knew?
As the report shows (PDF file), this is more than payment checks simply not catching up with the obit page. Part of it is typical bureaucratic inefficiency and nonsensical rule-making – evidently, the payments are legit as long as the farmer’s estate hasn’t been settled. And part of it could be outright fraud – survivors failing to notify the feds for years after a farmer’s death. About 40 percent of payments went to people who had been dead three years or more, and 19 percent went to people dead seven years or more.
The GAO’s expose comes at a good time for those hoping to reform the nation’s creaky, Depression Era-mentality farm subsidy system. House Democratic leaders are under pressure from big farm interests to retain the traditional payment system for several major crops. Reformers want to bar anyone earning more than $200,000 from getting federal farm payments, and they want some of those funds rerouted to conservation and nutrition programs. Then again, sending more checks to dead farmers might be seen as logical and efficient, in a perverse sort of way. Think about it: For decades, the federal government has been paying farmers not to plant crops. Who better to rely on for that purpose than people who are themselves, uh, planted?
4 Comments:
The Agriculture Committee has sent a bill to the floor that maintains the status quo. Its “new” farm bill continues to favor large industrial farms over family farms. It continues to give our tax dollars to a few ultra-wealth corporations while denying real help to rural communities and working families. If we take the savings from payouts to the super-rich and the deceased we can provide help to those in need.
The Kind-Flake amendment offers some hope of improvement. It would reform the old price guarantee to better protect farmers, redirect payments to farmers who are really in need, refocus resources on nutrition programs and boost rural development. The Fairness in Farm and Food Policy Amendment would do what it promises – bring fairness to a broken system. A just farm policy is one that helps working men and women in rural communities care for their families.
Why don't those poor farmers just grow oil? I mean corn.
Yet another reason while we ALL should go berserk when we hear the words: we need more taxes. At any level of government.
The waste is there. It's just too hard to look for it and remove it.
Far easier to reach into our pockets over and over and over.
Why isn't this clear to every one of us??
"Reformers want to bar anyone earning more than $200,000 from getting federal farm payments, and they want some of those funds rerouted to conservation and nutrition programs."
Here is a genius idea...we have a deficit, how about not "rerouting" the funds and just not spend them?
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home