Our new faces
Wouldn’t you just love to have a party with those 27 people?
You know the people I’m talking about – the 27 people who live in Cincinnati now who weren’t here 10 years ago.
The U.S. Census Bureau has admitted to a big “oops” as far as the Queen City is concerned. Instead of losing population faster than any major U.S. city, the bureau now estimates they undercounted us by about 22,000, putting us 27 up from where we were at the last census. So much for all that “woe-is-we-this-isn’t-a-fit-place-to-live-hole-in-the-doughnut” talk we (including the Editorial Board) has been engaging in. We are actually a growing place!
Twenty-seven people! That’s enough for a baseball game with three teams. You could have a decent-sized cocktail party with 27 people.
OK – 27 people isn’t a big number – nowhere near big enough to grow complacent about the problems the city has. But it is a start and we should celebrate that we are a city on the rise.
I propose we turn this over to a joint task force of 3CDC, the Chamber of Commerce and the Convention and Visitor’s Bureau. Find these 27 people – people who have made the choice to move to Cincinnati despite all of our self-described problems. These are people who have had faith in this community. Once the 27 willing newcomers have been gathered, take their pictures and put them on the giant TV overlooking Fountain Square. These are the new faces of Cincinnati.
Anybody else want to host a party for these folks? We should all get to know them.
8 Comments:
My husband is one of those "new" faces - but he only moved here to marry me. Does that count?
Oh, wait. My son grew up, graduated high school, and now lives outside of the city.
So I guess we are back at zero........
Are we really that stupid to miss the big picture? Cincinnati's Population Census size over the last five decades follows:
1950 504,000
1960 503,000
1970 453,000
1980 385,000
1990 364,000
2000 331,000
Is this corrected Total of 331,000 above the July estimate of 308,728 cause for celebration? Seems to me the City of Cincinnati has lost over 170,000 people since 1950. Should we let the celebration continue or do we need to demand another recount?
I'm pretty sure those 27 new residents live in the ranch house next-door to me, and if they don't turn down the Mariachi music soon I'm callin' the cops.
27 did you say 27. Oh I feel much better about my city now. I guess Mark "crime wave" Mallory can go back to bed and do nothing the city is just fine.
The 27 are living in a one room apartment on Garfield.
With the city's newly declining crime rate will Mallory fire his personal body guard?
David,
I applaud the efforts of The Enquirer to get the story out that Cincinnati has not, in fact, lost 22,000 people since the last census.
Of course, gaining 27 people is not the key point. Rather, the key is that the general population loss we have been experiencing since 1960 may have finally bottomed out. That is great news for our community. It means we are finally on the right track. It means efforts to incetivize development and homeownership have finally paid dividends. It means we have a chance to build on new momentum and change the perception that the city is in decay.
There is certainly still much to accomplish. We still have an aging housing stock (meaning acquisition and rehabilitation costs are higher than fair market value often pushing people out to the exurbs to find a bigger, newer home for less). We still have a school system struggling to make the grade. We still have too much crime. We still have too much bureaucracy in government. But, the population trend may finally be turning. That means more energy, more vitality, and a larger tax base to pay for basic services and economic development.
On top of all this, perception rules the day. People want to back a winner. People want to believe that their city is on the move, not on the decline. People want to live in a city that is not a punchline in the national and local media.
Let's celebrate this great news and create more successes!
Chris Bortz
Cincinnati City Council
Reads like Chris Bortz, City of Cincinnati Councilmen is prepping us for a tax raise.
anon 9:22am
"Reads like Chris Bortz, City of Cincinnati Councilmen is prepping us for a tax raise."
Nope. In fact, I'm stating nearly the opposite. With a larger tax base (more people), we can provide better services WITHOUT raising taxes. Picking up garbage, paving streets, eliminating blight are expensive endeavors. If we can provide better service in these areas, the community becomes more and more appealing to people and businesses. That is the cycle of cities and that is why this major population trend shift is so important.
Chris Bortz
City Council
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home