Life without political ads
This is my 13th straight election year as a member of an editorial board in one of five states. Lord knows how many candidate interviews that encompasses -- surely more than 400 -- if you count them all.
Though this silly season tests our stamina, it's always a rewarding civic exercise. It takes a lot to put your name, reputation and viewpoint out there at the risk of having them sullied.
For me, the biggest drawback is having to see those nasty political ads, many of which are beginning to look more and more like a Jay Leno or SNL parody. They seem to be especially pervasive during morning TV programming.
My question is this: Do you think you could make a sound voting decision without a) hearing the scary music lead-in followed by the pasty image of some poor candidate with a 5 o'clock shadow, b) hearing the familiar urgent, baritone voice-over telling you 5 O'clock Shadow Guy has criminal ties and wants to take your children's lunch money, candy or worse, and c) knowing that candidates "approve this message"?
Or do you think political ads simply add zest to the campaign season?
9 Comments:
Personally I am growing tired of the political ads. It is getting to the point where I do not even watch the local news.
It would be nice to see the candidates run commercials on what they plan to do in office, instead of lambasting their opponent.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
I always look forward to Election Day because I know that I will no longer be inundated by the pollution that is campaign ads. Until then I try to stay away from network TV.
Wow, the Enquirer decided to endorse Republicans for both Senator and Governor of Ohio. Big surprise there, huh?
Seriously, how can any respectable newspaper endorse Ken Blackwell after the outrageous smear tactics he's been resorting to?
No wonder newspaper readership is dwindling away. It's crap like this that led me to cancel my Enquirer subscription years ago.
Are you editors denied the latitude to discuss any issue of real import in the forum? You know, there's a very controversial war going on, our congress and President have just cancelled habeas corpus, and our "srong economy" floats on a three-trillion dollar deficit.
But here its all political adds, local kerflufles over pubic propriety, and the rightd and wrongs of smoking cigarettes. Get some perspective.
Its hard to believe Polls that have Blackwell down to Strickland 2 to 1. Polls have proven to be biased and agenda based, but 2-1 is still hard to believe. Taft, DeWine, and Vornovich are to blame for Blackwell getting tarred by their ineptness. Unfortunate, Strickland has nothing to offer but empty political slogans.
How is Strickland going to turnaround Ohio's overdependence on the declining USA domestic auto industry and their rustbelt suppliers? He has no answer but that we need change.
Who ever is elected will suffer during this prolongue transition away from auto industry dependence.
I think negative ads may have hit saturation. Everyone is using them so they may be ignored. And maybe, just maybe, people are starting to critically question what they see on TV and read in "liberal" papers like the Enquirer. It's great to see the Enquirer put in the spot where they have to choose between their own political agenda and their values. Just like Dennis Hastert, Joe Lieberman, Bill Clinton, and countless politicians from both parties, we see what matters more to them. Keeping one of their own in power. Enquirer Endorses Blackwell.
Okay! I saw the funniest political ad last night. Chabot (whom I AM voting for, BTW) is running a commercial against Cranley and he accuses Cranley of voting to taze 7 year olds. This 30 second speech about how much Cranley wants to taze little kids. My husband and I looked at each and just burst out laughing. It seems that the mud just keeps getting deeper and deeper!
I am seriously disappointed in many of the candidates this election season. I've always considered voting a responsibility and privilege. But it is becoming harder to take this duty seriously when it seems that both the candidates and the media want to treat elections more like sports or entertainment.
Mike Fox said that there are no consequences for nasty political ads. I, for one, will only vote for a candidate that shares my political views, is an effective leader, and conducts his/her campaign with integrity. I know that narrows the field quite a bit and it may result in a win for a candidate with whom I don't agree. But, "What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, and yet lose or forfeit his very self?"
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home