*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Pat Fischer on the Property Tax Rollback

Continuing The Property Tax Rollback Is The Right Thing To Do

City Council should continue the so-called property tax rollback. It is not actually a "rollback" because citizens still pay the same overall amount of tax. The increase in the property's valuation is simply not included in the tax calculation. Increasing the tax burden on our citizens will only drive more families and businesses out of our city.

Cincinnati has lost too many citizens because of high taxes already. To compete with surrounding cities for population growth, our tax rates must be as close to the nearby municipalities as possible. When that parity is reached, I would reconsider the issue.

www.PatFischer.org

Labels: , , , ,


2 Comments:

at 1:41 PM, October 23, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Individual residents (homeowners and renters who pay the property taxes passed on to them through rent) aren't the big winners with the rollback, they're the big losers.

Large corporations avoid paying taxes on their appreciating real estate, depriving the city of income to pursue programs that would increase the quality of life for residents. Those improvements will attract more people to live here. And with more residents, it's more attractive to companies to stay here or locate here because of the large body of qualified workers.

So we're losing hundreds of thousands of dollars in corporate taxes to save an individual $1.39? Pools, police, street improvements, arts funding, expanded recreation programs, parks, we the city residents have had to skimp all those things in order to save Convergys and other companies some money.

 
at 2:28 PM, October 23, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Geez Pat, you are so courageous!

So how do you propose to produce savings? Slash $3 million for healthcare centers that serve the poor? Close battered women's shelters? Close swimming pools?

Are these better alternatives to actually making homeowners pay property taxes that reflect the increased values of their homes (at a cost of a whopping $8 annually!)?

You know you support this rollback because it helps large scale developers. Don't pretend otherwise.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck