*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Saturday, October 06, 2007

Ghiz and the anti-marijuana ordinance

Last week, Leslie Ghiz posted this item about the Draconian marijuana ordinance she supported. Someone asked if she would have the "spine" to repeal the ordinance. (I have vowed to work toward in conjunction with Vice Mayor Crowley and Councilmember Qualls to do exactly that. Commissioner Portune has reported that judges have told him this ordinance is a "major cause of overcrowding in the jails," and he also opposes this ordinance!)

Ghiz quotes a bunch of numbers out of context to scare voters into thinking this law does anyone any good.

In approximately the first year of this law, 577 whites were arrested and 3,644 blacks were arrested. It is likely that biased number has only increased in the past few months. Ghiz says the law targets not recreational smokers, but dealers. Can we really believe that all these thousands upon thousands of people were dealers? (By the way, selling marijuana was already a crime!)

And what about the guns confiscated? The number represents less than 2% of those arrested. What about the other 98%, who now have enhanced criminal records because of Cincinnati's over-criminalization? In Cincinnati, possession is a greater crime than the rest of the State of Ohio. With these permanent marks on their record, these 98% now face challenges in terms of housing, employment, and educational scholarship opportunities.

Combine that with not only the racially-biased manner with which this law is enforced, and we have a real problem.

Some studies have suggested that at-risk urban adolescent males and young men are likely to carry illegal guns at a rate of 4% or above. That seems to indicate that the anti-marijuana ordinance actually targets a statistically LESS violent portion of the population!

We need to stop falling for this constant rhetoric of fear. Charlie Winburn says City Council is playing "Russian Roulette" with our lives. Todd Portune and Si Leis had a pro-jail press conferenc in the County building in front of large piles of scary-looking weapons. When asked about a marijuana law, Leslie Ghiz starts talking about cocaine, and heroin. What she does not mention is the portion of arrests generally that can lead to these same seizures.

And let's not forget -- smoking marijuana and dealing marijuana were already illegal before Cincinnati made it an even greater crime.

Under all this talk of crime, we lose sight of the people who live in this City and hope to make it home. Of course everyone wants to live in safety. But promoting a culture at City Council that threatens to cut services to the poor, while over-patrolling in poor neighborhoods, arresting more people for crimes of poverty (like homelessness) while we build bigger jails and make more laws -- all these things show that Cincinnati has inverted priorities.

We need to put people first. We need to focus on taking care of the least among us. We need to spend our energy improving general quality of life, not giving large handouts to big corporations, like a $30 million parking garage to Corporex paid for by raising everyone's taxes.

We need to take care of each other, not scare each other into an election year frenzy so professional politicians can secure another two years funded through hundreds of thousands of dollars of special interest money.


9 Comments:

at 3:24 PM, October 07, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

When I hear a politician, or in this case a want to be politician, start flapping their lips about how our criminal justice system and its laws are "racially-biased" it makes want to scream. Putting aside the issue of whether or not the anti-marijuana ordinance is good law for the moment, lets focus on the ridiculous charge that our justice system is racially biased.

According to the US Census Bureau as of 2006, Cincinnati has approximately 332,252 people living within the city. Of that number approximately 44.3% are Black. According to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report for the year 2006, Black criminals account for 50.9% of all murders and nonnegligent manslaughters and 56.3% of all robberies. Meanwhile Blacks account for approximately 13% of our total population. To even the most math-challenged people, it should be clear that Blacks account for an overwhelming amount of serious crime, well beyond their numbers (but let me guess, they are all innocent but framed by racist cops, right?). If we look at Black juvenile crime (those under 18) the numbers get even higher with 59.2% in the murder/manslaughter category and 67.4% of robberies. In terms of total violent crime Blacks account for 39.3% and in the juvenile crime category account for 51% of violent crimes. In terms of drug abuse Blacks account for 35.1% of all crimes and in the juvenile category account for 30.1%.

When we combine these facts of percentage of population and percentage of crimes committed, Mr, Jeffre's numbers putting Blacks at 86.3% of those arrested under the aforementioned ordinance does not come across as particularly biased in any way, shape, or form when we take into account our local population's racial breakdown. This leaves us with one of two possible conclusions, either Mr. Jeffre is an idiot or he is pandering to Blacks in order to curry favor at the polls.

Newsflash Mr. Jeffre! We don't need to arrest a matching number of whites to the number of Blacks we arrest especially in light of the fact that Blacks account for most of the crime as has just been attested to by the facts. So perhaps we should just arrest, convict, and punish any criminals we can get ahold of and just let the numbers fall where they will.

I also note that you whine about the penalties involved with using guns while committing crimes, namely "these 98% now face challenges in terms of housing, employment, and educational scholarship opportunities." This is called consequences of being a criminal and committing crimes. If a person does not want to face more challenges in "housing, employment, and educational scholarship opportunities" then perhaps the right answer is not to commit the crimes they are out there currently doing, or is this too obvious for you to consider?

If you want to be considered a serious candidate Mr. Jeffre then perhaps you should stop being so intellectually dishonest when it comes to issues of public safety. That is the paramount purpose of government after all, to protect the people. If government is not doing this right, and it is not currently due to among other things lack of jail and prison space, then all citizens suffer.

One last parting thought with regards to the anti-marijuana ordinance, if a person sells even a single joint to another person, they are in fact a drug dealer by definition. Do try and remember that when you next want to go running off about how racist and racially biased things are here in Cincinnati.

 
at 7:52 PM, October 07, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're exactly right, Justin - this failed experiment by Ghiz reflects the across the board result of the drug war -- all cost and no benefit.

 
at 8:47 AM, October 08, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you are serious about running for council, maybe you should show it by not using lame nicknames to put down the other candidates. That's not going to win you any votes. Give the voters real answers with real positions and action plans, and leave the personal insults to the bloggers.

 
at 12:39 PM, October 08, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

To 3:24 PM Oct. 7th:

I think we will be living with the consequences of racism for a very, very long time. Many other cities have very obviously developed over the last 30 yrs, a very solid Black middle class which can help to engage and assist others who may not have taken advantage of some of our broad social changes.

Cincinnati is still economically, and therefore racially, segregated. Even the statistics you cite indicate as much. Many people have fled Cincinnati and Hamilton Country proper beginning in earnest in 1968; the city pandered to those exiting by eviscerating it's transportation system and contributing to the sprawl which essentially abandoned and killed the downtown area. (That's when I get tired of the jaw flapping: rebuild downtown, rebuild downtown - maybe you shouldn't have helped people leave with a million tiny decisions along the way..)

To say that the justice system is racist is to be too literal and too easy to dispute with statistics but when you take into account the LIKELIHOOD of a young Black person engaging in criminal activity due to life circumstances, it's a better guage of where we are on the long road out of our profound national mistake. Just because the latest wave of civil rights activity didn't eradicate the whole problem, doesn't mean we have the luxury of being tired of it.

In fact you'd better take a deep breath; as our national economy tanks and the poorest among us increase their numbers, you'll still be contending with these types of statistics.

 
at 2:51 PM, October 08, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whoa, Whoa, Whoa - 3:24 PM, October 07, 2007 Anonymous: Let's talk about real legislation and real reform - and that cannot be done by 'putting aside the issue of whether or not the anti-marijuana ordinance is good law' because it would be ignoring a major source of what's wrong with the existing legislation. Marijuana prohibition is surpassed in stupidity only by alcohol prohibition, and we all know how that worked out, hey, Mr. Capone? BTW, anyone heard about any drive-buy shootings associated with bathtub gin lately?

As for the impact upon blacks, that's skewed because the impact is always upon the lower social strata and those who are poor. The poor are hit hard; a lot of blacks are poor and disadvantaged; the likelyhood that a poor black is going to be picked up is increased. Is that racism? Probably. Is it social enginerring of the malevolent kind? Certainly. Does it result in even greater disadvantage for blacks? Absolutely -and here's a flash for you, it hits those whites who are picked up too.

Another reality - what is the damage done to an individual because of drugs? The negative impact is in the judically imposed penalty - the record, the felony hit, the deprivation of various rights, the negative impact upon the violator's resume' - and for what? Squat and to increase the bottom line of that special interest as welfare for law enforcement. Their budget.

The Drug War is perpetual, expensive, at least 4 decades long if you only go back to Nixon - and for what? It's all cost and no benefit. Sorry to kick your sacred cow, but law enforcement has its negatives and this is most definitely a negative. A courageous legislator would propose and courageous legislators would pass reform legislation that would treat this subject from some vantage point like reality instead of the fantasy world in which the drug warriors live, along with their self perception as comic book heroes. There is no contribution to society there that can be considered positive.

 
at 4:21 PM, October 08, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seriously, there are way to many uptight self righteous people in this town - the war on drugs is a lot like the war in Iraq - poorly planned and a waist of valuable resorces. Pass all the laws you want, put as many bad cops on the street as you can, build the biggest baddest jail in all the kingdom. It doesn't matter to criminals, they will do what they want to get what they need as long as the opportunities for jobs, housing, education, and medical care are out of reach.

 
at 7:13 AM, October 09, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok, I accept the responsibility as a blogger of making personal comments about Ghiz; I wasn't going to bother, but I am an occasional blogger.

She wears those big scarf type headbands and this time, when concocting this cockamamie marijuana crackdown, she had it tied a little too tightly......

And as long as I've bothered, Jean Schmidt's bun is a little too tight also - or maybe the wide-eyed girl innocent type is just back in vogue, and this method is cheaper than having cosmetic work.

I have posted seriously 99% of the time, and will restrain myself from wasting digital space henceforth.

 
at 1:16 PM, October 09, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

In response to the first comment from Anonymous:

First, I love it when people have such conviction in their beliefs that they can't state their name.

Second, your numbers are irrelevant. Everyone knows that crime rates for blacks are disproportionately high. But you quote the numbers from the FBI Crime Report as though they are empirical evidence that blacks commit more crimes. All they are is an extrapolation of several localities. The FBI simply aggregates arrests reported at a local level.

Also, the FBI reports that WHITES are responsible for 60% of drug abuse related arrests. Go to this data table and scroll down - http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_49.html

And then, try to actually read up on all the facts and figures before you start quoting them.

 
at 2:41 AM, October 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

A thought for Kate Harrow: Some of the Greatest Americans to ever have lived have published work either anonymously or under a nom de plume with Ben Franklin being one obvious and very famous example. The fact that you don't know my identity provides me with a small degree of protection against nut jubs that might attempt, and perhaps succeed, in tracking me down to give a piece of their mind or something else that I don't want. This is something that has happened to me in the past when my name real name has been used. Bottom line here is whether or not what I posted is accurate and true, and it is.

So instead of attempting to attack my character, perhaps it would be much more productive to our discussion here to focus in on the facts.

Your attempt to discredit the facts here in your second point by dismissing the information from the FBI is quite weak. There are over 3000 police agencies in the United States and a supermajority of them report their stats to the FBI so it is not simply a matter of "an extrapolation of several localities" as you put it. You list correctly that Whites account for 60% of the drug arrests, but you fail to factor in that Whites account for approximately 73% of this country's population meanwhile Blacks who account for approximately 13% of the population total account for 38.7% of the drug arrests. Clearly in terms of race, Blacks are committing more crime than Whites as their ratio of population to crime is several orders higher than that of whites as the percentages show which was the point I was making to show that the criminal justice system is not racially biased like the criminals and criminal sympathizers claim.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck