If a Muslim neighbor speaks…
Though the title may only reflect half of the story in the guest column American Muslims must speak honestly, it speaks to multiple needs in America that are imperative to its safety and cohesiveness. In a post 9/11 world, the fact is that American Muslims must speak loudly and clearly about the unacceptability of acts of terrorism and, yes, all violence against innocent civilians. These acts being disassociated from having any justification in Islam is paramount. Simultaneously, fellow Americans of all faiths and cultures must realize that without listening, learning and willing to participate in the conversation, void of defensive or abusive attitudes, is a crucial path to breaking the self-destructive cycle of mistrust and unjust violence.
How many Americans know that the Islamic Society of North America has published an anti-terrorism and extremism brochure which can be downloaded? Not many as the coverage it has received in our mass media has been zero. How many Americans know of the Islamic religious ruling or Fatwa endorsed by over 120 Islamic organizations, including the Council on American Islamic Relations, condemning terrorism and extremism and calling people who commit terrorism in the name of Islam as “criminals, not ‘martyrs.”’ ? This was, rightly so, something called for by people of all faiths to differentiate Islam and everyday Muslims from the hate-mongering individuals who abuse Islam for their personal or political objectives. Yet, this goes virtually unknown as letter after letter and editorial after editorial is certain to coin the phrase ‘why don’t Muslims condemn atrocities of 9/11 and other acts of terrorism’.
Majority of American Muslims, like their neighbors of various faiths, have lived the American life while being committed to their faith and country in a very private way. Though many of them would much prefer to continue to do that, it seems they do not have that option. The evil actions of some, who might claim to be of their faith though their actions are completely un-Islamic, have dominated and forced many of them to share their faith in a very public way in order to promote understanding while they try to exercise their right to continue to live in mutual peace.
Are we willing to listen?
15 Comments:
Shakila--
Thank you for the thoughts expressed above. I know firsthand many Muslims, and when I hear people ask "well, why don't Muslims speak out against terrorism," it reminds me of an ignorant bully who slaps you in the face with your own hand and tells you to "stop hitting yourself."
It is decidedly ironic that the Muslims who speak out against the violence of terrorism have just about as strong a voice and platform as we Americans who spoke out against the Iraq War. In this country today, we have a soft-serve media that covers neither group well, and a public that would rather complain with loud voices about us than open their ears, minds and hearts, simply to listen to what we have to say. . .
Black people get the same question: "why don't Blacks speak out against Black-on-Black crime"? I find the question rather insulting and notice white people are never forced to answer such a question.
Thank you Shakila, you bring up many good points. One of the most important is that we need to listen to each other. We are assaulted daily with talking heads on TV who call themselves journalists and shock jocks on radio whose only interest is in ratings and definitely not in diseminating real information. And it seems like all these people have something to say about the American Muslim community while I doubt that any of them has ever taken the time to really listen to the Muslim community. For those of you out there who would like to listen you can tune your radio to WSAI AM 1360 on Sunday evenings from 5:00 to 6:00 and listen to a new program called "Your Muslim Neighbor" hosted by Brent Meyer. Give it a try!
I came across those documents you referenced on the Web a few weeks ago while I was surfing on "american muslim". All of the documents are quite strongly worded in their condemnation of both acts of terrorism and the perptrators themselves.
There is unfortunately too little exposure of American Muslim spokespeople in the media. I have heard and seen Karen Dabdoud a few times on local and national media, but we could certainly stand to see more like her and more often.
Of course, there will always be persons who refuse to listen to anyone who is regarded as different.
Nate Livingston what world do you live in?
The US Senate and House of Representatives is mostly white people bashing other white people on every topic politically possible. Have you heard of the Democrat and Republican Parties? Have you heard of Liberals and Conservatives? Aren't these a majority of whites criticizing a majority of other whites?
What nonsense that whites never criticize whites.
The main time race is an issue regarding a white's critical comment is when a white person dares to criticize a minority or minority-favorable-policy.
Shakila Ahmad, thank you for posting your article on North America Muslims publishing literature and issuing Fatwa against the practice of extremist violence in the name of Islam and the teachings of the Koran. (Although, suicide bombings of civilians to aid the fight against a military occupying force may be permissible.)
This is the first time I became aware of any effort by the Islamic community to instruct and control any within their extremist Islamic brotherhood.
You ended with the question “Are we willing to listen?”
Non-Islamic practitioners could be listening 100% to your message and be of negligible consequence. The problem of extremist Islamic behavior in the name of the Koran and jihad will only be solved by Muslims correcting the problem within their own worldwide Islamic community.
I’m glad to learn there is a basis for the condemnation of extremist Islamic behavior within Islamic teaching. This message of peace needs to be spread by you voicing your message loudly and often to your Islamic brotherhood.
Current events are evidence that your message has not been heard.
1) Pope Benedict asked for dialogue between Christianity and Islam to resolve differences. He referenced a similar historical request and the evil of spreading ones religious message by the use of force (sword) as unjust. For this he was loudly condemned by the worldwide Islamic community and forced to cower into a corner to apologize. I did not hear the American Islamic counter message to encourage the Pope’s request for peaceful dialogue.
2) The worldwide spread of madrasas and their hateful teaching within continues, possibly poisoning forever the minds and lives of many young Muslims. What effort are you undertaking to close these madrasas and counter this indoctrination of hate?
3) Who are your national and worldwide leaders within Islam preaching the message you portend to teach. If they exist, I do not know a single name. I do know of Osama Bin Laden, Al-quada leaders, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and others. If your leaders were effectively preaching a counter message of peace, I would know their names.
And so I ask you “Are your worldwide Islamic brotherhood listening to your message?”
The article makes some good points but to claim that the Imams were innocent of wrongdoing hurts the authors credibility. The Imam's acted in way that appears to me designed to intentionally scare passengers and airline security. They did not sit in assigned seats, but instead spread through the airplane in a manner similar to the 9-11 terrorist. They requetsed seatbelt extenders they did not need or use. The extenders could be used as a deadly weapon. They prayed loudly using the words, "Allah Akbar!”. Although this may be part of a routine Muslim prayer, it is also what terorist scram before beheading victims or committing suicide/murders. The talked loudly in their native language invoking the name Osama Bin Laden and criticizing US Iraq policy. Any reasonable passenger would have been scared to death. Many likely would have left the plane if the Imans had not been removed.
For an excellent column about the behavior of the Imans, read this from the Wall Street Journal http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009348.
I am in favor of a more open dialogue with moderate muslims. But when this columnist claims the Imams were innocent of victims, I think he needs to get his facts straight
Though fighting back for your homeland is something any faith or nation can relate to, it is my understanding from both talking to Muslims and reading on my own that suicide is forbidden in Islam and considered a grave sin. Use of suicide, the ultimate act of desperation in fighting injustice cannot be just if innocent lives are destroyed in the process. The act of suicide to fight has been used by countless people including actively today by the Tamil Tigers in Sir Lanka.
Respect for all human life must be resonated if we expect to have our lives respected. Silent majorities in Islam, America and the world must see the grave error in the methods of people who commit the horrific crime of suicide bombings and take innocent lives as well as those who go into pre-emptive wars where hundreds of thousands of innocent lives are lost as 'collateral damage'.
It is these silent majorities, the Muslims of the world and we Americans, who suffer the most as we allow these things to continue.
Wow, to the poster of comment 8, that was a fascinatingly tom-clancy detailed article!
So let me get this straight: you think that the next wave of plane hijackers will dress up like Imams and start praying right before boarding the plane they plan on destroying?
Its not like they were being very covert about their "Islamocity" now was it? Give me a break!
This was ethnic tension revealed in its purest form. I think the Wall Street Journal article is bogus. It wouldn't be the first time that newspaper has been used to defend corporate interest. Its obviously a hit piece trying to sway public opinion before a suit is brought against the airlines.
If this had been Christians praying, nobody would make a big deal about it. If Christians had been kicked off the plane, you'd have both the ACLU and Bill O'Reilly defending them, which would be, scary . . .
But because they're Muslim, they don't realize that in America, you're treated differently when you believe in a religion that not every American has been exposed to.
I'm ashamed for whoever reported these people, I'm sure the Imams weren't talking about bin Laden and Saddam before boarding the plane.
How could anybody be that stupid?
Clean up your own worldwide Islamic house and yard, before you criticize others, and hope to gain acceptance from your neighbors who are not followers of Islam.
The message we do hear in the news DAILY: Muslims and Islamic followers are killing others because they are non believers.
I think that one can infer from the Imam's behavior that they were intentionally trying to provoke an incident. It was a big publicity stunt that had the unfortunate effect of inconveniencing a full plane of innocent passengers. Fortunately, as the facts of the incident become more well known, the effort will fail.
I would like to know--Anonymous at 12:07 AM, December 07, 2006--would you have gotten on that plane? Would you have taken the risk on your life that they weren't terrorists? Just a question...
Also, Christians didn't run a plane into a building, so we wouldn't be on edge about them praying before getting on a plane.
at 11:23 AM, December 05, 2006 Nate Livingston said...
Black people get the same question: "why don't Blacks speak out against Black-on-Black crime"? I find the question rather insulting and notice white people are never forced to answer such a question.
What a load Mr. Livingston. White on white crime is addressed. They are put in prison and no excuses are made. Screams of racism are not heard throughout the city; riots are not incited; boycotts are not started. Whites don’t typically blame the police for doing their jobs.
Black on black crime is blamed on everyone and everything except the perpetrator. I have yet to hear the race baiting sharpton and jackson showing up support the police or EVER call for a stop to black on black crime, if they did their shakedown empires would collapse.
Nate said: I find the question rather insulting and notice white people are never forced to answer such a question
Patience Nate. The day is coming in America when all of us, regardless of race, creed or color will be equally suspect. Every citizen will have his/her " patriotism" examined. It will no longer be a question of are black people " patriotic" or are muslims. Make no mistake. When someone demands that you condemn this or that; they are asking you " who's side are you on? "
" Do you want us win the war? " That question is being asked of those who not only have opposed the Iraq war but even those who criticize the handling of the war.
It's a difficult question to answer for two reasons: #1 Nobody knows anymore what winning in Iraq means. #2 Most people are now realizing what many of us knew from the start; - Saddam was as good as it gets in Iraq. So, we can't win
Try to imagine a family watching the father preparing to jump out of a window. The step-mother is urging the kids to watch daddy fly! The kids are protesting that it is impossible for daddy to fly. She insists that you are a "daddy hater" if you don't join her in this fantasy that daddy can fly. Even as he is only inches from the ground, she claims he will float if only the neighbors (suspected gravity collaborators and the far left media) would shut up!
A recent poll has found, only 9% of americans think the war is winnable. Yet we continue on. I am of the opinion we will expand and escalate the war. If we take this path with the vast majority of the nation opposed to it - the only result can be an entire nation under a microscope of suspicion. We will all be potential enemy sympathizers, collaborators or just plain loathsome " defeatists". That's usually what happens when a small group ( The State) wage war that the larger group (The People) oppose and see as futile.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home