Harvesting votes on the taxpayers' backs
There's nothing like an election year. President Bush has discovered fiscal responsibility during his lame-duck tour since he no longer has to run for anything. But politicians running for re-election think the gravy train is still running.
A news release landed in my inbox from Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the most powerful Republican in the United States Senate. He is running for re-election. Among other things, we learn that Mitch is in favor of school kids eating healthy food. He apparently is less concerned about how farm subsidies hurt taxpayers -- not to mention how farm policy helps drive up the cost of food. This puts him in the same camp with Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic speaker of the house and big advocate of the bill. Maybe fewer people would need food stamps, which is most of the cost of this legislation, if food prices weren't shooting up.
Here's Mitch's press release:
Senate Passes Farm Bill; Helps Kentucky Farmers
“Kentucky farmers will benefit greatly from the many important programs that are promoted and preserved in this bill”
The conference report contains a wide array of conservation efforts which will lead to improved air quality, cleaner drinking water, and less soil erosion, among other environmental benefits to our commonwealth.
The conference report also contains a provision authored by Senator McConnell to support
“The horse industry employs 50,000 Kentuckians and contributes $3.5 billion to our economy year-round,” McConnell said. “By adding this provision to the bill, we have ensured that this important part of our farm economy is treated fairly.”
The Farm Bill conference report is supported by the Kentucky Farm Bureau.
==================
I'm no expert on the tax advantages of depreciating race horses, so maybe that's a fine idea. But here's a dose of reality on the farm bill from USA Today, the New York Times and other sources:-- It is expected to cost $289 billion over five years.
-- It is larded with earmarks added by lawmakers in election fights.
-- It maintains subsidies for corn and other crops despite the fact that prices are at record levels and many farmers are doing quite well these days.
Even the president can't stomach the bill for the way it rewards big-time farming. He noted that couples making as much as $2.5 million a year could qualify for payments.
This is classic Congressional behavior: Take something that needs to be done and make it cost far more than it should. President Bush has threatened to veto the bill. Members of Congress are confident they can override. And, by the way, according to the Times, neither Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama nor John McCain bothered to show up and vote.
0 Comments:
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home