What about public boarding schools?
Schools have been expanding their reach for many years, adding kindergarteners and then preschoolers to their primary school program. Many offer after-school care and summer school, and some offer year-round schooling.
Maybe it shouldn't surprise us, then, that Chicago Public Schools is considering offering a boarding school program for kids who are from unsafe or troubled homes, and for children who are homeless.
The idea is still in the planning stages with a call out for proposals.
On one hand, it's not a surprising development given how often school staffs talk about their frustration with all the factors outside their control -- from parents on crack to children who are left alone or abused.
But should public schools take on the parenting role to this extent? Is it a wise expansion of services for an institution that is already involved in children's lives, or is further shifting the focus from a school's main purpose -- to educate children?
10 Comments:
Sounds like an orphanage. And we do need to bring them back to replace the goofy foster care system.
This is a good idea. Only the kids know how it feels to be in such unsafe situations where they have little chance to succeed. To me this would improve the lives and successes of those students. Plus they probably would be better taken care of - nutrition, safety, discipline.
If they can't get that at home, is it their fault? No - so what do we expect the kids to do if we can't control what their parents do?
I would buy into it ONLY if the boarding schools were structured similiar to military schools.
Wouldn't this be a great venue for the kids to do their homework so they would have a chance to raise their test scores?
Another reason (below) I think this would be a good idea for several kids esp in the Chicago area.
I agree with the person who said the set up could be like military schools. However - not 100% like that - just that it should be very disciplined - not boot camp but a lot of structure. They should be able to have outlets for fun as well so perhaps only somewhat like military boarding schools.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23824652
A city is stunned by rise in teen murders
Since September, 20 Chicago Public Schools students have been killed, 18 by gunfire. Last school year, 24 of the more than 30 students killed were shot to death, compared with between 10 and 15 fatal shootings in the years before.
"The loss of life that we've seen among our young people is ... devastating," said school district spokesman Michael Vaughn. "This gun nonsense has reached a crisis level."
As a parent in the struggling Milford school system, I can't agree with this idea. The schools are already taking on too much responsibility, and the money isn't there, either locally or through this state. (Illinois may be different) Yes, it's inexcusable that some parents don't take care of their children but aren't there other social services in place to deal with these problems? I'm not willing to pay more in school taxes to force our teachers to "raise" children who are not their own. Education should be the only priority for our public schools.
Why don't we just cut to the chase and have Big Brother take the kids right out of the maternity ward, teach them to be politically correct and turn them loose on the rest of us.
I was a teacher many years ago, and I like to think I did a lot of good. Part of my effectiveness was that I didn't try to be all things to all students. Schools should not be trying to take the place of families.
We need to reverse the process that created this mess we are now in, not advance it.
No offense but I don't think the kids in the Milford school district are experiencing the same things that the kids in the Chicago Public Schools System are experiencing. Over 20 kids actually killed this school year and close to 10,000 homeless kids? That is a significantly more severe situation. I know that if I were one of those kids I would want the adults around to consider many options and not just leave me hanging because they are too concerned about their taxes. I would want to feel safe (at all times), have food to eat, have a place to sleep, and not have to worry about dodging bullets at any time. I would think that is the least I could expect. Remember that kids have limited power and cannot force social service agencies or schools or parents to do anything to help them. They are the most vulnerable and I think its great that Mr. Duncan is even considering this. He must realize that years and decades of talk about helping has not done much at all to help the kids. They have to consider real & dramatic action.
Concerned, you are right. Milford isn't Chicago and yes, they obviously have a more extensive problem there. However, fixing these problems is not the responsibility of public education. As "says who" mentioned, the schools are suffering from the "mess" of a thousand past good intentions, otherwise known as mission creep, and I honestly don't think we can pile more responsibility onto their plates. I believe this is the case no matter how big the district or how serious the problem of child neglect. These children do need help but as I've already mentioned, there are other institutions designed to give that help.
You imply that my concern for my increasing taxes is not a valid concern. May I say that no amount of money will cure our societal ills--a society that far too often fails to protect and value its children. It's a sad but true fact that defenseless kids have, and will always suffer from problems not of their own making. That doesn't mean we make the schools responsible for curing those ills. Let's go after the parents, instead.
I guess I don't have the kind of faith in parents that have never been really helpful that you do. I don't think that parents who have a habit of being absent, drunk, drugged, abusive, or just simply incompetent are just going to change because many others in the community want them to.
I think that the fact so many of these kids are homeless, in foster homes, and prone to getting shot says that these particular parents have not been able to help them.
I take the side of the child in these instances. I ask myself "What if I were homeless and my mom was an abusive drunk who cared more about her cheap vodka than she did about me?"
I would be all for a plan like this.
The problem is - with all the recommondations and declarations that seem to be made over the years, decades, etc - nothing much ever changes. The abused grow up to be abusers. The children of drunks and druggies go on to have similar problems. It really is a vicious cycle.
If those kids can be given a chance to be successful (along with being safe, sane, healthy, etc) I think that would do more to break the cycle than any talk of many politicians or even local parents demanding that other parents do this or that.
Once a person becomes an adult, it is nearly impossible to change that person. He or she is rarely going to go from an incompetent self absorbed parent to a caring involved parent. I just don't believe that happens.
So then, what does a kid do? Right now they just end up like their parents or worse. We, as a society, can do much better than that.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home