*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

Ohio voting: Papering over the problems

Voters turned away from their polling places. Officials scrambling to print more paper ballots for voters to fill out. Candidates suing to keep the polls open. Accusations of voters being "disenfranchised."

Just another election in Ohio, right?

While it's too early at this writing to evaluate just how widespread and serious the problems in Tuesday's Ohio primary will have been, not having enough paper ballots on hand for party "crossover" voters is clearly at the center of it, particularly in Cleveland/Cuyahoga County.

You can argue about how many "extra" ballots should be prepared, the logistics of how you get enough of the precinct-specific ballots to each polling place, and what should be done with the reams and reams of leftover ballots. But here's one indisputable fact: If you didn't have to use paper in the first place, it wouldn't be an issue.

Less than two months ago, Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner ordered Cuyahoga County to switch from the direct recording electronic (DRE) or touch-screen voting system it was using, along with another 56 of the state's 88 counties. Her action was based on a study she commissioned that, predictably, warned that DREs -- or Diebold Republican Evils to the election-conspiracy theory set -- were vulnerable to security breaches and could theoretically be tampered with, although it didn't document any instances of such tampering or even evaluate the possibility of it happening.

The Ohio ACLU, warning of potential problems, sued to stop the switchover, but lost early last month. And an Enquirer editorial wondered whether "Brunner's frenzied solution is worse than the actual -- not perceived -- problem."

Wonder no more. Cuyahoga's forced scramble to change its voting system has taken its toll. Add to that a rush-hour ice storm in the area, near-record turnout and shortages of poll workers, and you have a mess.

In January, Brunner said she was ordering the changes to "avoid any loss of confidence by voters," but Tuesday's primary snafus may help create a loss of confidence.


8 Comments:

at 7:20 AM, March 05, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

sorry but i would rather kill a few more trees than to ever let the republicans steal another election with their diebold voting machines.

 
at 10:08 AM, March 05, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're mixing apples and oranges as usual.

Apple:
You must have an accessible paper trail on election results. I urge everyone to look beyond this local news source to see studies/scandals about these machines. For example:

Google: Stephen Heller whistle blower Diebold

Orange:
The real issue is those registered Republicans who crossed over to try to "game the system" to stop the most popular/electable Democratic candidate from getting the nomination, thereby giving MCain a better chance for victory in the Fall. That's OK the law allows it, but the two issues are not related.

 
at 10:18 AM, March 05, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Also: google: Athan Gibbs who died before completing a new voting machine system being supported by Microsoft - a result of the voting irregularities of at least the last two Diebold rigged elections.

Again, Mr. Cooklis, you underestimate what we know now that we are no longer relying solely on a-media/2004-March/000034.html

 
at 11:03 AM, March 08, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually Ray, the problem was not Ms. Brunner's, IMO. The problem was that the Republicans, instead of voting in their own party primary, decided to jump into the Democratic vote in order to alter the results to their advantage in November. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see it.

The state thought, as would be expected, that each party would vote in their own primary. That didn't happen. How was the state to know? They assumed folks would be honest and play by the rules. Well, they know better now, but I doubt we'll see such a crossover rate in November.

I like paper ballots; we've seen far less problems and have greater security of our vote with them than we do with the voting machines. But I might change that opinion once the issues with the machines can be addressed and corrected. Time will tell...this just isn't the time yet.

 
at 1:36 PM, March 11, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually, it's not OK for a Republican to crossover and vote in the Democratic primary for the sole purpose of gaming the system - espeically if they signed a statement agreeing to support principles of the Democratic Party. It's not OK; it's fraud. For anyone interested in pursuing the egregious election fraud committed in this primary election contact Ohio's Secretary of State at 614-466-2655 or go online to http://www.sos.state.oh.us/ContactUs.aspx?Code=default
Something needs to be done to prevent this from happening again. Republicans have no clue what the "honor system" is.

 
at 6:53 AM, March 13, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

to 1:36 Pm 3/11
Thank you. That was to be my next step. Maybe seeing some respectable Warren or Butler County burgher taken out of his house in handcuffs (that's how Mr. Law-and-Order Giuliani used to do it and it was dramatic...) would get the attention of the others. BTW and off topic, those are ex-urbs, not suburbs of Cincinnati and I wish the media wouldn't make that mistake so often. Suburb implies that they are within city limits and entitled to services from this city when in fact the city, being fearful of the flight from the center has catered to them for far too long. They need to create their own city center and MOVE ON, or get back on board here.

 
at 12:48 PM, March 14, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not affiliated with either political party, on purpose. They call me an "Independent" because they need a box to put me in. Suits me fine. But the one thing I did NOT do was vote in the primary, because it has always been my understanding that only party members could vote, within their respective parties, in order to choose their respective candidates.

I vote in November for whomever I feel is best among the choices offered. But I have no business affecting the actual choice of candidates for the general election in November, because I'm not affiliated with either party. So, I DON'T vote in the primaries.

For the vast numbers of Republicans who chose to commit fraud, and Clermont County was one of note along with the other counties mentioned, there needs to be legal recourse. This is supposed to be an honest system, and since they HAVE chosen a party affiliation, they need to stick to it. Otherwise, they have two choices: publicly switch parties before the primary, or stay out of it as I do. Amything less is a crime, and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and I'd be saying this if the situation and the parties involved had been reversed, politically.

It's time to bring this system to justice. It's time to verify the votes in the counties mentioned to see if in fact there was fraud committed. And if so, there needs to be legal recourse. Now is this paper big and bad enough to lead the call?

 
at 6:52 AM, March 21, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's what an unbiased newspaper reported about the voting crossover:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/
articles/2008/03/17/many_voting_for_
clinton_to_boost_gop/

Please note that in the remaining primary states, the parties have restricted the voting to members of their own party.

Note to self: remember that this is blog and therefore editorial in nature, not real reporting. (But it was still a nice attempt at propagandizing.......)

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck