Primary Pallor: "No Candidate Filed"
When it comes to casting my ballot, I’m as pro-choice as they come: I actually want to be able to choose between candidates for a particular office. The audacity! Too often, however, that’s an unrealistic expectation. Take the March 4 Ohio primary, at least in much of Hamilton County.
I called up the sample ballots available for my precinct on the Hamilton County Board of Elections Web site (some other county boards also have this online feature). Here are the grim facts: Aside from the presidential race and two county ballot issues, only one contested race appears on the Republican ballot in my precinct – Pat DeWine vs. Kathy King for the GOP nomination to a Common Pleas judgeship – and none are on the Democratic ballot.
Yes, it is a partisan primary, and each party might be expected to have fielded only one candidate in many races. But oh, if it were even that crowded. In many races they haven’t mustered up any candidates. On the Democratic ballot, 16 races are devoid of names, with the solemn advisory “No Candidate Filed a Declaration of Candidacy for this Office.” It’s only one on the GOP side, but that’s not much to crow about. What this means, of course, is that in the November election, 16 Republicans and one Democrat will get a pass.
You might chalk it up to this year’s highly publicized “deal” between the county GOP and Dems not to field candidates in certain races, but this sort of thing has been going on for decades, especially when judges and countywide offices are on the ballot. Take a wider look, and it’s even worse:
=In the fall of 2002, two-thirds of the seats in the Kentucky House were unopposed.
=In the fall of 2003, there were 90 uncontested “races” for local offices throughout Hamilton County – plus eight with no candidates at all.
=In the fall of 2004, 48 of the 100 Kentucky House races and eight of 19 Senate races had no opposition.
=And in the fall of 2006, one of the U.S. House seats from Kentucky had no major-party opposition!
What concerns me most is what young voters, especially first-time voters, might think when they see their primary ballots after all the build-up they’ve experienced for this civic exercise. I can imagine they’ll think: If it doesn’t matter to the parties and candidates, why should it matter to me?
Uncontested layups in March, I like. Uncontested seats, not so much.
3 Comments:
Check out chrisdole.com for Hamilton County Commissioner
Finally, Mr. Cooklis, you and I agree! This system works from the ground up - someone, get out and run for dog catcher!
I read that many voters don't vote at this point, not from laziness or lack of interest, but rather from feeling disenfranchised, like the game is rigged. This might be a good way to feel like you can get back in.
Thanks for the post.
You say: "You might chalk it up to this year’s highly publicized “deal” between the county GOP and Dems not to field candidates in certain races, but this sort of thing has been going on for decades, especially when judges and countywide offices are on the ballot".
Been going on for years?
When's the last time the local political hacks rigged the election for County Commissioners? Why don't we just have a coronation instead of an election?
The petty, small town politics around here is a disgrace. And no one even seems to care...least of all the Enquirer. I often wonder why the paper's editorial voice has been reduced to an occasional whimper.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home