Tight squeeze for Southgate firefighting
Retired Southgate Fire Chief Ray Muench, 80 years young, called me to say I really needed to see the Southgate firehouse for myself.
Southgate, a small Campbell County city nestled between Wilder, Newport and Fort Thomas, desperately needs a fire station. A referendum to increase local taxes failed by eight votes a few months ago. That's too bad, but it seemed silly that talks about consolidation weren't serious since neighboring stations were less than 2 miles away. I said as much in a Forum blog posting.
What I learned on my visit reminded me that sometimes what seems logical on the surface isn't always the way to go.
Chief John Beatsch was a young firefighter on the scene of the Beverly Hills Supper Club fire. Now he volunteers when he isn't running a convenience store in Fort Thomas. He convinced me that consolidation won't offer better fire protection to Southgate residents and certainly won't lower their taxes.
So, they're back to the drawing board with plans for a scaled-back proposal that should reduce the maximum cost to about $1.2 million.. This time, Beatsch said, he hopes the council simply will vote to raise taxes instead of going to a referendum. It'll cost the average taxpayer less than $100 per year. Homeowner's insurance and taxes could go up more than that if the department merges, he said.
Lest you think the department isn't busy, the chief said that they had 180 fire calls and about 300 ambulance runs last year, many in support of surrounding communities. All, he said, on a budget of about $200,000 -- $179,000 from the city and the rest from fund-raising. That's less than 20 cents per day per citizen.
Not doing anything shouldn't be an option, which brings me back to my tour of the aging station. The floor of the station is holding a load many times beyond its safe capacity. When they have meetings in the basement, they have to pull the two trucks onto the street. And they can't pull one of the trucks out without removing the other -- a loss of potentially critical response time.
If you live in Southgate, you really should see it for yourself. For now, check out the photo that shows the tight squeeze when they pull out of the station. The trucks have to be custom built for a lower height. And pictured, from left, are my three tour guides: Muench, Beatsch and Assistant Chief Steve Rath, one of the few paid firefighters. Rath also is on the Fort Thomas department.
Beatsch thinks consolidation will come someday. But he argues that the new station will be that much more valuable for the merged department, local insurance rates and -- most important of all -- rapid service that you hope and pray you never need. I think he's right.
2 Comments:
I have an off-topic suggestion for the Enquirer...
Today you printed a guest column by Edward Smith Jr that was a response to an earlier piece by syndicated columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. In his column, Smith writes:
The Enquirer's Jan. 28 Opinions page featured a syndicated column by Leonard Pitts Jr., in which he minimized what Republicans had done for African-Americans and equated Republican conservatives of today with the Southern Democrats who owned slaves and created segregation. That is an outrageous insult.
The Republican Party was founded in 1854 by people who were opposed to slavery. They either wanted to abolish slavery completely or to contain it in the South.
...Pitts asked, "Why haven't 'conservatives' ever supported us?" We have. Pitts is a free man because of Republicans.
This is a ludicrous and illogical response to Pitts' original column, which stated:
It's disingenuous to pretend there is some philosophical coherence between the GOP of the 19th century and that of the 21st that should command African-American loyalty. Where race is concerned, Democrats and the GOP essentially exchanged ideologies in those years, the conservative Democrats becoming more moderate, the moderate GOP becoming more conservative. Black voters changed their loyalties accordingly.
Pitts must have had many responses like Smith's, because he has a followup column today:
A week ago, in response to a reader's question, I wrote that black voters do not support the Republican Party because conservatives have never supported them. Dozens of you challenged that. You sent e-mails asking how I square that judgement with the fact that the Civil Rights Act had significant GOP support.
In a word: easily. See, I never said Republicans have never supported black people. I said that conservatives -- "whether you're talking Democrats of the 19th and early 20th centuries or Republicans now" -- never have. Yes, these days Republican equals conservative. But back in the era of the act, there existed a creature -- it seems mythical as the kraken these days -- called the moderate Republican.
That's who lent support to black people. But social conservatives of whatever party? Not so much. The Civil Rights Act bears that out. About 100 of the 126 nay votes in the final House tally were cast by representatives from that foundry of conservatism, the South. This would include Rep. Thomas G. Abernethy of Mississippi, who said the act granted "dictatorial, gestapo-like" power to the government.
I hope the Enquirer will do the right thing and print Pitts' followup column.
People hate to pay for firefighters but they sure appreciate them when their house is on fire.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home