*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Bortz on Streetcars: A Cure for the Naysaying Headaches

Is City Council living in reality? Well, not in the old reality. The old reality said that Cincinnati can't accomplish anything or that Cincinnati is moving backwards. And that we are going to continue to cut budgets, cut services, and lose population. The old reality had various jurisdictions working in isolation. CPS didn't work with the City, the City didn't work with the County.

The new reality is that we are beginning to work together to solve our problems. We are starting to realize that we are all in it together as a city and as a region.

The new reality is that we are making good progress on our priorities of public safety and economic development. We have a fully developed and implemented Strategic Public Safety Plan that has resulted in a double digit decrease in violent crime. GO Cincinnati - a strategic economic development plan - is nearing completion.

And now we have a streetcar proposal in front of us that could really tie things together and catapult us to the next level. As much as it is about transportation, it's also a tool that creates economic development and public safety. To not act "until the streets are completely safe" is a recipe for failure. Public safety and economic development go hand in hand.

And I think we do have to admit, when it comes to transportation, Cincinnati is 10 years behind. At least. The conversations that have begun on the streetcar proposal are exciting. Even Peter Bronson's editorial contributes to the conversation. Big ideas, transformational ideas, should be met with an "Are you crazy?" Now we enter the phase of educating people and explaining, "No, it's not crazy and here's how it would work and here's what's in it for you." The questions that have been answered so far, in broad terms, are "Is this feasible?" and "How much of an economic impact will it have?" After nine months of statistical and geotechnical analysis, economic modeling, and research, we know that the answers are "Yes" and "1.4 Billion."

But that isn't the end of the conversation. It's just the beginning. There's no denying that we have serious short-term challenges but we can't continue with short-term fixes.

We will continue the community dialogue and the due diligence including answering, Can we afford it? Can we raise $11 M in private contributions? Can we create $20 M from public-private partnerships?. We have to be open to possibilities and big ideas and envision a new reality for tomorrow's Cincinnati.


5 Comments:

at 12:36 PM, October 24, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Makes sense. You can't sequence development that neatly or it will never happen (hmmmm, does that ring a bell?). There have to be multiple initiatives developing in parallel if you are ever going to get anywhere.

Of course, crime is still major issue, but if it stops us for pursuing other projects that we need to do to grow and improve our city, it is elevated beyond crime; it becomes (successful) terrorism.

 
at 8:48 PM, October 24, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why don't we have the street cars go directly to your newly built condos on Eastern Ave. You know the ones that used economic development money. How many campaign dollars and yard sign locations did you get from those sweet deals?

 
at 9:18 PM, October 24, 2007 Blogger Sean F. said...

Amen!

 
at 6:35 PM, October 27, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yep, the Bortz' brothers have been on Ciy Council for many years - gathering information all over the city on vacant property, buildings the city can sell, having access to all the Econmic Development records in order to relay this info to Towne Properties of which they have interest in. They get the inside information in order to buy up property and get these tax breaks which have HURTING US. It all started when Arnold Bortz was on Council. He left council a couple of months before his term ended.Probably got all the info he needed. No wonder Bortz runs for council on his expertise of Economic Development. Got it from his family.

 
at 2:28 PM, October 29, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hundreds of developers look at deals in Cincinnati. It's pretty damn competitive and I don't believe Towne Properties benefits from Chris on Council--to the contrary as they steer clear of anything that could even look funny. Go do your fact checking "anonymous" ... signed, anonymous

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck