*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Monday, May 14, 2007

They're having an election. Who cares?

Political reporter Pat Crowley had a story in today's Kentucky edition of The Enquirer that I found profoundly depressing. I say that even though articles about low voter turnout have become cliches in America. Predictions now are that turnout in the May 22 KY primary could be in single digits in some precincts.

Pat's story quoted a number of people who said something like this: "Why, between the kids and my job, I'm just too busy to pay much attention, and it doesn't do any good to vote anyway."

Let's dissect this logic for why most Americans don't fulfill their most fundamental obligations as citizens.

First, consider "I'm too busy."

I haven't met a single person who says they're too busy who doesn't find time to watch DVDs, read books and magazines, play Sudoku, go to online chat rooms or do myriad other discretionary things even though, jeepers, every single hour of the day is just filled up.

And you can't blame the media for this one. The race is getting plenty of coverage. And anyone with access to a computer can click a mouse and learn all they want to know about the candidates for KY governor in a matter of minutes.

Then there's this: "It doesn't matter."

The next governor could profoundly affect all of these subjects that apparently don't matter:
Decent, quality schools
Affordable, accessible health care for ourselves, our kids & our parents
Whether we have good jobs in our community
How we regulate things like gambling and abortion in this state
Whether we have a clean environment and affordable energy
How much we pay in taxes

A governor has a lot more to do with what happens in the place where we live than any President of the United States. People in Africa stand in line all day in the baking sun to vote. Given a chance for democracy, thousands of Iraqis voted despite threats to their personal safety.

We'd wonder why the rest of the world thinks we're hypocritical, but we're too busy.


13 Comments:

at 9:47 AM, May 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thumbs Down Comment to Junk Science:
"Listen to Mom on global warming"

Christine Perdan Curran of Anderson Township is the mother of three and a graduate student in environmental health at the University of Cincinnati.....yet she is a Junk Scientist.

Listen to Mom on global warming MYTH

Typical Liberal nonsense, apparently even as an environmental health
graduate student, Christine Perdan Curran doesn't understand the
poisonous differences of Carbon Monoxide poisoning versus the Carbon
Dioxide we natural exhale as humans.
Very sad that a blithering idiot is able to perpetuate the myth and
misinformation of the dangers of Global Warming.

 
at 10:41 PM, May 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The first step to solving voter apathy is a simple one: make Election Day a federal holiday.

This is truly a no-brainer. Voting is the very foundation of our government. Yet we can't allow workers that one day off to perform their civic duty? I really don't understand why it hasn't happened already. I mean, Columbus Day is a federal holiday, for crying out loud! Surely we can all agree that Election Day deserves that distinction more than Columbus Day does.

This idea of course won't completely wipe out voter apathy, but it's an important first step.

 
at 7:24 AM, May 15, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

ummmm ... okay

So anyway, back on topic - it really is sad that so many people can't be bothered to exercise one of the most precious rights we enjoy in this country. I'd go so far as to say it's more than a right - it's a responsibility. We take suffrage for granted in this country. Sadly, those who don't bother to vote are usually the ones who complain the loudest when things go bad.

 
at 8:55 AM, May 15, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dennis Hetzel, Didn't you earlier solicit and agree to collect for later consolidated publication:
Thumbs Down and Thumbs Up contributions?
Where should these be posted?

 
at 6:38 PM, May 15, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've never missed an election of any sort, but I've got to tell you, it has become quite an exercise in frustration and impotence. Doesn't seem to matter WHO is elected, from WHICH party. Politics has become a corrupt endeavor, where the only thing that matters is the buck.
Frankly, I'm just worn out.
Really, who can disagree with me?!

Electing just matters little anymore. Politicians are all the same, no matter the platitudes they spew while campaigning. We, the people of America, just don't matter. The ONLY thing that matters is winning the next election, and pandering to whoever needs pandering to in order to do that. Power corrupts, and all of that....

 
at 7:24 PM, May 15, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's simply no reason for a principled person who believes in freedom to vote.

It's by and large a choice between being robbed by thugs dressed in red vs. thugs dressed in blue.

I personally refuse to sanction EITHER. Until we get proper rights respecting candidates, I refuse to give the existing candidates the impression of legitimacy.

 
at 4:50 AM, May 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not voting to show your contempt for the political process only empowers the ones you hate.
Voting is not tedious, rather refreshing because "I've tried to change my situation" instead of whinning about it. Outcome is not always what I wished for, but worth the effort and required by my personal responsibility.
The real problem with whole process is the way the "parties" have usurped our place in determining who will represent us in the Government. They show us who we will vote for, not who we may want because the party doesn't support them. Think about this, if we truly elected a person that we wanted.....who would have the upper hand in how things go? We the people, thats who. How many politicians come from money? Most all of them. Why have we not been albe to elect a regular person to office?... the parties do not endorse regular people, thats why. The parties are run by money people -for money people. We need to change that word money with the word many.

 
at 8:12 AM, May 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's simply no reason for a principled person who believes in freedom to vote.

It's by and large a choice between being robbed by thugs dressed in red vs. thugs dressed in blue.

I personally refuse to sanction EITHER. Until we get proper rights respecting candidates, I refuse to give the existing candidates the impression of legitimacy.


With all due respect, this is the most flawed logic I think I have ever seen. It's not like boycotting WalMart because they put nudie magazines at the checkouts. This attitude is wrong on so many levels, I don't even know where to start.

If everyone who was eligible to vote actually went to the polls, things COULD change, and things WOULD change. You wouldn't see the same people and the same parties continuing to get elected.

People have died protecting our right to vote. In other countries, people die trying to vote. In this country, people would rather read magazines, or boycott trying to make a point no one will ever notice. It's truly unbelievable how much we, as a country, take our most basic and most precious civic responsibility for granted.

 
at 9:11 AM, May 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blaming non-voting on apathy is shallow analysis and the problem won't be solved by mere exhortation. Voting needs to catch up with the times. If I can make secure purchases over the internet with a credit card, why can't I vote over the internet? Why, in the 21st century, should I have to take time off work to go stand in line for an hour. Ridiculous. The issue is response cost, not apathy. (Although a few candidates with spine and new ideas might help a little, too, so that we had a real choice.)

 
at 11:31 AM, May 18, 2007 Blogger Dennis Hetzel said...

That's a great point. Oregon has led the country in making voting easier and others should follow suit. Of course, many incumbents say they want high turnout, but they really don't like it, because it's less predictable than elections where you can count on your loyal base. The whole point of negative campaigning is to suppress turnout for the other side. Will Internet voting be fraud-free? No way. But there won't be any more fraud and mischief with Internet voting than we see now.

 
at 1:28 PM, May 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

With all due respect, this is the most flawed logic I think I have ever seen. It's not like boycotting WalMart because they put nudie magazines at the checkouts. This attitude is wrong on so many levels, I don't even know where to start.

If everyone who was eligible to vote actually went to the polls, things COULD change, and things WOULD change. You wouldn't see the same people and the same parties continuing to get elected.


So, somehow, by voting for people I do not support in any way shape or form, things are going to change? Change into what? Obviously nothing I want.

BUT, if I and enough folks like me refuse to vote, then there won't be enough voter turnout for the elected folks to claim to have a legitimate mandate. Further, it sends a signal to other politically minded folks to PROVIDE a PROPER RIGHTS-RESPECTING CANDIDATE in order to get folks like me to vote again. I'm not apathetic, I want to replace the current immoral system.

Frankly it's folks like you and all the "lesser of two evils" folks who are responsible for our current mess. They grant legitimacy to the socialists and parasites on the left and the mental defective American Taliban on the right.

NEITHER is a proper choice.

 
at 11:48 PM, May 20, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chris & Mom are WRONG. She should know :Carbon MONOXIDE kills; carbon DIOXIDE helps vegetation produce OXYGEN.
See PHOTOSYNTHESIS. She & other Junk Scientists should refrain from exhaling for 30 minutes, to improve earth.

 
at 8:08 AM, May 21, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Frankly, it's folks like YOU who REFUSE to vote who are responsible for our current mess. You want change, yet your answer is to sit back and do nothing? Voting for the people who don't represent the "socialists and parasites on the left and the mental defective American Taliban on the right" does more to change the political system then by sitting on your recliner watching the election results scroll across the TV screen, while shouting obscenities at the results you had NOTHING to do with.

If you don't bother to vote, you have no right to complain about the process, nor to complain about the results.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck