*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Friday, March 02, 2007

5 secrets local governments want to keep from you

Here's a posting from Enquirer First Amendment reporter Gregory Korte:

Sunshine Week begins March 11, and the Enquirer is compiling a list of government records that ought to be public -- but aren't. We started the list with input from reporters and editors. Now, we'd like to fill out the list with suggestions from readers.

1. Ohio foster parent records. After the death of 3-year-old Marcus Fiesel in foster care last year, the Enquirer asked the Ohio Department of Job & Family Services for a list of all licensed foster homes in the state. The agency refused, saying the list of foster care providers could, indirectly, violate the privacy of the children living in those homes. The Enquirer is now suing in the Ohio Supreme Court to get the records.

2. Rosters of Local School Decision Making Committee members. These committees help decide school budgets and policies, major personnel decisions and even where to locate a new school. But the Cincinnati Public Schools have denied repeated requests -- from the Community Press newspapers and the Enquirer -- for rosters of who's on these boards, providing only a list of the chairmen's names.

3. High school coaching recruits. Applications for public school jobs -- from superintendent to high school football coach -- are not public record in Kentucky, although their counterparts in Ohio are. Schools say that releasing applications for high-profile jobs "would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

4. Search warrants. When judges at the Hamilton County Courthouse had a practice of putting a blanket seal on all search warrants in Hamilton County, the Enquirer protested, arguing that the decision to seal a court record could only be made on a case-by-case basis. But search warrants remain shrouded in secrecy. Of 482 search warrants, affidavits and inventories filed so far in 2007, 87 percent are sealed. Even once the need for secrecy is over -- because police have the evidence and have pressed charges -- judges rarely allow the public to see who police are searching and why.

5. Gun permits. When the Ohio General Assembly allowed residents to get a permit to carry a concealed weapon, Gov. Bob Taft threatened to veto a provision that would make those permits secret. He later struck a compromise with gun proponents: the permits would be available to journalists for legitimate newsgathering, but not to the public. Effective March 13, the state will close even that small opening. Without those records, the public wouldn't know, for example, that former congressional candidate Paul Hackett was licensed to carry a concealed weapon when he chased down vandals in Indian Hill. Or that Bennie Hall Jr. -- who shot a 14-year-old who was stealing his car in Kennedy Heights -- also had a license.

Do you agree that these records ought to be public? What records ought to be on this list? What is your government not telling you? Let us know. E-mail the Enquirer's First Amendment Desk, leave a comment below, or join the discussion in our message board on this topic.


7 Comments:

at 4:35 PM, March 02, 2007 Blogger Brah Coon said...

Well, it seems to me that you Enquirer big shots are trying to be all cheeky and cover your butts re: the publishing of the Carroll jurors names.

All the five categories that you list plus some should be a matter of record. Now, that does not mean that The Enquirer should publish all this and more - merely because you CAN.

For example: I could go to the clerk of courts and get the home address and SS# of someone arrested for DUI last night if I wanted to. But my doing that and you at The Enquirer publishing that same info as if it was some great public service is another matter.

Sunshine is good! If one seeks sunshine. But, great Scott, man! Don't act like you are doing good by staking us spread-eagle out in the sun on an anthill! get me?

 
at 4:38 PM, March 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

1. Maybe a better approach would be to request the steps family services takes to investigate potential foster care homes. How complete is the investigation, and how often do they return to licensed homes, checking the home.

2. A needed check.(agree)

3. Any public business receiving
tax dollars needs to be
completely accountable.(agree)

4. These records should be secret and revealed at the proper time, in court.(disagree)

5. Names of citizens who have gun permits should not be made available to the public. Publishing those names would compromise the citizens ability, and security, of carrying a concealed weapon. Officials who need to know that info have the ability to obtain it.(disagree)

 
at 8:33 AM, March 05, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's Monday morning, so I assume someone is now at work down at the Enquirer blog department. If you are concerned that your Liz Carroll blogs have been littered with 800 phone sex numbers (from "Wallace or Kimberly Gibson") over the weekend, you might want to clean this mess up.

 
at 10:27 AM, March 06, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the juror didn't come out to speak to Daugherty, then maybe we would not have found out how flawed our jury system is. There is scientific studies which state that a juror can truly believe to be proper and not pre-determine guilt. But, truly does as we have found out from Ms. Weinstein. There is no doubt she gave it her best, but sub-conciously she had her own private thoughts.
Judge Ringland, well loved in Clermont County indeed, should declare a mistrial and move the case to another county as maybe it should have done in the first place.

 
at 3:13 PM, March 06, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Enquirer could save a lot of time and money dragging this thru the courts. Just launch a full blown investigation into the Hamilton County Jobs and family services.It shouldnt take a cub reporter more then a few weeks to find that this is one of the most corrupt agencies in the state of Ohio run by some of the most vile corrupt human debris you can imagine. When taxpayer money is confiscated and redistributed by a state agency you can smell the corruption from blocks away.

 
at 7:07 PM, March 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the Enquirer was really concerned about the publics right to know. THey wouldn't hide juveniles' identities when they are charged with crimes.

 
at 6:00 PM, March 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why are the names of minors not published in the paper? I don't believe that it is illegal.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck