*

*
Today at the Forum
Opinions from members of the Enquirer Editorial Board


David Wells,
Editorial Page Editor


Ray Cooklis,
Assistant Editorial Editor


Krista Ramsey,
Editorial Writer


Dennis Hetzel, General Manager,
Kentucky Enquirer/NKY.Com


Jim Borgman,
Editorial Cartoonist



Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Nullified

My friend marked her ballot at her polling place in Landen and asked the poll worker if she should insert the pages into the scanning machine one at a time or together.

"It doesn't matter," she was told.

It doesn't matter? How can the machine read the back of page one when it is sandwiched against page two? Unless those machines have CAT scan units in them, I have to think some of Pam's votes weren't counted.

Looking at the results of Tuesday's elections, I'm more convinced than ever that voters work hard to appreciate the nuances of the issues and weigh the candidates carefully. Pam is that sort of person. To think that a clueless poll worker's casual advice can nullify a thoughtful voter's choices makes me ill. Who knows how many voters that poll worker cancelled out?


5 Comments:

at 9:50 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those machines at the precinct level are to check for overvotes giving optiscan ballots an advantage against spoilage.

 
at 11:16 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

i'm surprised the machine wouldn't jam up.

btw, great editorial cartoon today.

 
at 1:15 PM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

My mind just boggles at the pure stupidity of most people and it's super scary to realize that they're the ones voting for the decisions of this country!

We can get a man on the moon, yet we still can't figure out a way to get accurate counts from the polling places! Really? Is it that hard? GO TO COMPUTERS...ALL COMPUTERS!

 
at 3:20 PM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're right. Just think of all of the votes for Victoria Wulsin that may have been nullified in this way. Good thing it looks like there will be a recount.

 
at 7:09 PM, November 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is a very important question for a newspaper to answer. Just how does the Hart Intercivic eScan operate? Does the initial scanning check just for over and undervotes so a voter has a chance to do over mistakes. Or is the precinct level scanner actually tabulating votes?

http://www.hartintercivic.com/files/eScan.pdf

Afterall the reporters and editors who believed that the Warren County BoE lockdown during tabulation was no big deal probably did not understand the myriad of ways an election can be subverted when punch cards are tabulated by a card reader.

Who knew how easy it was to mistabulate votes by assigning them to a different precinct or that an icepick could be used to invalidate a stack of ballots.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck