Study should settle Spence truck debate
Should big rigs be banned from the Brent Spence Bridge during rush hours? It was an interesting idea when Covington Mayor Butch Callery, among others, suggested it. The idea was worth studying.
Well, a study done by the Ohio-KY-Indiana Regional Council of Government concludes the ban would eliminate few accidents, move traffic congestion to Int. 471, do nothing to improve air quality and cost truckers a lot of money because, in the trucking industry, time is money.
On top of that, it would be difficult to enforce. Realistically, when you see the number of violations that don't get enforced now, it could become little more than a joke. Click here to see the data in detail. Here is our story.
So, now we know. Let's move on. If nothing else, the study underscores the importance of getting Int. 471 ready for a big traffic increase once work starts to replace the Spence.
The issue really is a symptom of a national problem with transportation and infrastructure, where all answers seem to lead to roads and highways. If we're serious about saving energy, lowering pollution and reducing truck congestion -- all excellent things to take seriously -- we could take a fresh look at having a world-class system for rail freight.
8 Comments:
first, i think the study is a bunch of hooey. anyone who has been on the interstates during rush hour knows that trucks cause most of the problems. they can't accelerate or decelerate as fast as a car can.
more importantly, why stop at a world class freight system. bring back passenger trains.
People want to drive cars and passenger rail is not cost efficient (or wanted). Also, trucks pay more than their fair share of highway taxes. Our economy is based on good trucking.
I want passenger rail.
Are highways cost-efficient?
(P.S> I own a car and love to drive, by the way.)
Kevin,
In Cincinnati (and cities like Cincinnati), highways are the best bang for the buck. In cities like NY or Chicago, rail then is needed due to the heavy congestion.
Excuse me? 11:02 Dec. 25, Cincinnati DOES have a congestion problem. We see it every single morning and evening on the traffic reports, and the #1 culprit is I-75. The problem is physical, in the design of the highway that didn't allocate room for expansion as usage grows.
Here's a wacky idea...how about banning CARS from the Brent Spence until we get it replaced? The load on I-471 will not be as bad, cars can move around faster, we don't get paid for our time on the road, so it's economically viable, and it is safer for everyone.
By the way, I'm a driver too, and I'm fully in support of light passenger rail AND freight rail. Absolutely. The sooner we offer options to driving for those of us who want them (AND WE DO WANT THEM), the better.
Cincinnati wants to be Chicago. Well, get a clue.
Happy New Year, everyone. Oh, and Enquirer? Totally unrelated to this topic, but your "community representative" position has been occupied by the same person for over a year, yet you claim to rotate the personnel every six months. To date, I've seen nothing from this person on these pages since the first month you appointed her. You say you rotate the position...Did you forget? We could use someone who actually performs in the role.
What about the stress the trucks put on the roadbed/bridge structure in the meantime. As the bridge ages, waiting for repair/replacement the extra weight, moving slowly at rush hour cannot help.
All the safety reports in the world cannot guarantee that the one big collapse won't happen. Those studies are great guestimates like insurance company analyses. I think that's the reason we should immediately reroute trucks.
Also, people may want cars and there will always be a place for them in our society - science doesn't go backward. Poeple want lots of things which may or may not be good for them. But we need to scale back and real leadership makes that attractive by redirecting tax dollars, including taxing fuel (ugh, especially in economic downturns) and giving $$ support to rail use both commercial and passenger. I love passenger trains for national regional movement and also light rail for intra-city. Let's do it.
Well when the Brent Spence collapses, I sure don't want my car on it! I don't drive over it now and I don't intend to start anytime soon. It's too easy for me to use one of the other bridges.
No matter how much money we waste on studies, it's a fact that the bridge needs to be replaced. Let's see if Kentucky can make it a priority. Bwaaaaaaaaa-ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaa!!
I am 7:49 Jan. 2nd.
I forgot: our population is aging (me too) and do we really want all us geezers on the road as our faculties diminish, and we continue to insist on talking on the phone, playing with laptops and other distractions?
I'd rather take a passenger train and a good book to Florida to visit the other geezers who will retire there.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home