Views on the news
John D. Woods, Sr., a sometimes commenter on this blog, suggests below that if I really want to know why readers seem to prefer stories about such subjects as Anna Nicole Smith and Lisa Nowak to more serious topics like Bush/Cheney, Iran and government fraud and waste, I should go to a post on his blog, where he expounds on the subject. Going to that site, I found a claim that he tried to say the same thing on this blog, but that the comment got blocked.
My policy is to let up any comments that abide by our terms of service. Generally that means no bad language or gratuitous abuse and that the commenter stay on the point of the discussion. The latter is generally left to other commenters to police.
The point is I don't recall ever seeing this particular comment, and would not have blocked it if I had. We can take criticism, and if you have read our print edition during the past five years you know that we frequently have run letters from people who disagree with us.
So here is John's post. He makes some valid points, although I would argue that while the media in general caters to the readers's choices, it doesn't create the preferences in the first place.
Glad to have you join us John. Feel free to chime in any time.
4 Comments:
Mr Wells, allow me to apologize for assuming that my previous attempt to post was blocked. I commented on five or six different posts last night, and three, which were in some way critical of the Enquirer, mysteriously were lost in the ether.I admit to a certain paranoia these days, but should not have made the assumption that I did about being blocked.
Thank you for you kind explanation.
I do accept it, and apologize for my error. I will try harder to not rush to judgement in the future.
David--
In answer to your wondering why more people prefer crap news to real news, I would say that the same is true for food. Most news consumers are like children: if you place a plate of fresh vegetables or a Happy Meal before a child, which do you think the child is going to choose? Sure, the vegetables are the healthy choice, but kids, like most news consumers, will go for the flashy box and cheap plastic toy that accompanies a less than healthy cheeseburger.
I stopped watching the "Local News" casts on TV a few years ago, and I tuned in the other night by mistake and was sorrily reminded why: on the news, it talked about a stabbing incident at the new King Island Resort Hotel. (Keep in mind, this was at or near the top of the news.) At the end of the "story," the anchorwoman talked about the new resort and even listed the price for a night's stay there! It was no less "news" than a cleverly placed advertisement.
And thus is the nature of the news market. But the real news is boring, because you have to pay attention for a lot longer than "Entertainment Tonight" to appreciate what is really going on. Most news consumers, like fast food customers, do not want to take the time to do that, so they opt out for the crap.
As the crap keeps people attention, we have seen a saturation in recent years as network and cable network news, along with newspapers like the Enquirer, increasingly cater to the "infotainment" news genre.
While the Enquirer is still better than the post, it is a sad state of affairs when the "news" section of the newspaper is dwarfed by the sports and entertainment sections, which tell us the scores of the most recent football games and who is sleeping with who these days in Hollywood.
What the modern media is doing to people by catering to their worst desires may be capitalism, but it certainly is not responsible.
Modern media promotes ignorance in the people just as surely as fast food promotes diabetes. People seemingly cannot help but consume what they know is trash any more than they can look away from the trash of Anna Nicole Smith on the Television set.
Declines in things like voting and civic participation are symptoms of this disease. I have yet to figure out what exactly is the cure, but I'm sure that, like fast food, the answer lies in educating people to be moderate (or, gasp, even healthy) about what they consume, both in terms of what they put in their stomachs and their brains.
Hey John; are you any relation to Edward D. Wood Jr?
Anyway man, whoever it was said "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" sure was right! ;)
I can't believe your behavior over the weekend and now publishing the jurors names, etc. If I was a subscriber I'd cancel.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site. << Home